Re: libc shlib version

2000-11-14 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Not sure if you saw this message. The more I think about it, I'm not * sure bumping the shared libc version will accomplish anything other than * require a compat4x distribution for 4.2-RELEASE. For the 4.0R upgrade * kit you'd just have to

Re: libc shlib version

2000-11-12 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] * In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Satoshi Asami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * * It was brought to my attention that recent 40upgrade kills all the * networking programs. Looking at the plists, the only thing I can * think of is that libc.so.4 has

Re: libc shlib version

2000-11-12 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Any pending bumps should *definitely* occur before the release goes * out, so consider me all in favor. You guys may have missed what I said in the first mail. That implies rebuilding all packages. I can do that, but I'm afraid it will most likely

Re: building pgp5 from ports fails

1999-10-23 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Having said that, is there any way you could get bento building restricted * ports, but not publishing the packages? It's quite useful for the kind of * thing I tried to apply it to (i.e. figuring out whether the port itself is * broken, or if it's

Re: building pgp5 from ports fails

1999-10-17 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Looks like you have either an outdated port, or extra crud in there * somewhere. The PGP5 port is building fine, according to * http://bento.freebsd.org Uh, which part of bento said so? ;) I believe you are referring to the fact that there is no