On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Mike Meyer wrote:
> What's missed here is that running an old kernel and a new userland is
> more likely to screw things up.
In fact this is now broken if you try to build -current on a -stable box.
You can't run the -current userland on a -stable kernel to do an install
an
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
typed:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
> > Yes, but the problem I usually have is twofold: I usually run
> > mergemaster in single-user mode,
> You don't have to do that. Nothing you install in /etc (except
> hosts.allow
On Wed Apr 24, 2002 at 12:17:37AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > On Tue Apr 23, 2002 at 11:07:18PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > > > The main issues I see about pa
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Sierchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > Depends on the user. My rc.conf has perhaps 15 lines and some of those
> > are simply there because the OpenSSH and bind ports in STABLE tend to
> > lag quite a bit behind the release and the port versions are installed
> > in
On Apr 20, at 02:59 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Jan Grant wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Calvin NG wrote:
> >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I believe when people say copy rc.conf from /etc/defaults/ into
> > > /etc/, and go throught it line by line, they really mean,
>
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
> ... so the one left to discuss
> is inetd. At this point changing the default back seems to be the most
> reasonable course of action, even though everything in /etc/inetd.conf is
> off by default.
There is nothing to discuss. Leave everything off in /et
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
> My .02:
>
> There seems to be a few recent situations where fundamental changes
> were made in a way that didn't easily slipstream into the stable
> upgrading process. (ie sendmail changes and the new users necessary,
> which bit me. I think the pro
My .02:
There seems to be a few recent situations where fundamental changes
were made in a way that didn't easily slipstream into the stable
upgrading process. (ie sendmail changes and the new users necessary,
which bit me. I think the process of adding those users should have
been either in
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I really hate to see the suggestion that people copy files from
> /etc/defaults to /etc. This really breaks the paradigm of having only
> changes in defaults in /etc so that defaults can be changed with a
> normal system update.
But that was ne
