On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/12/2012 14:34 Kimmo Paasiala said the following:
>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> I have MFCed the following change, so please double-check if you might be
>>> affected. Preferably before upgrading :-)
>>
on 23/12/2012 14:34 Kimmo Paasiala said the following:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> I have MFCed the following change, so please double-check if you might be
>> affected. Preferably before upgrading :-)
>>
>> on 28/11/2012 20:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>>
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I have MFCed the following change, so please double-check if you might be
> affected. Preferably before upgrading :-)
>
> on 28/11/2012 20:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>
>> Recently some changes were made to how a root pool is opene
I have MFCed the following change, so please double-check if you might be
affected. Preferably before upgrading :-)
on 28/11/2012 20:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>
> Recently some changes were made to how a root pool is opened for root
> filesystem
> mounting. Previously the root pool
on 20/12/2012 00:34 Kimmo Paasiala said the following:
> What is the status of the MFC process to 9-STABLE? I'm on 9-STABLE
> r244407, should I be able to boot from this ZFS pool without
> zpool.cache?
I haven't MFC-ed the change as of now.
After I eventually MFC it you should be able to boot fro
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Recently some changes were made to how a root pool is opened for root
> filesystem
> mounting. Previously the root pool had to be present in zpool.cache. Now it
> is
> automatically discovered by probing available GEOM providers.
> The n
on 01/12/2012 15:36 Pawel Jakub Dawidek said the following:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:51:48AM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>> GREATE in a diskless environment, /boot is read only, and the
>> zpool.cache issue has been bothering me ever since, there was no way (and
>> I tried) to re route it.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:51:48AM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> >
> > Recently some changes were made to how a root pool is opened for root
> > filesystem
> > mounting. Previously the root pool had to be present in zpool.cache. Now
> > it is
> > automatically discovered by probing available
>
> Recently some changes were made to how a root pool is opened for root
> filesystem
> mounting. Previously the root pool had to be present in zpool.cache. Now it
> is
> automatically discovered by probing available GEOM providers.
> The new scheme is believed to be more flexible. For examp
Recently some changes were made to how a root pool is opened for root filesystem
mounting. Previously the root pool had to be present in zpool.cache. Now it is
automatically discovered by probing available GEOM providers.
The new scheme is believed to be more flexible. For example, it allows to
10 matches
Mail list logo
