Hello.
I have the same problem on a FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT box (SMP machine running
CURRENT for testing and experimental purposes only). The problem occured
approximately the same time when I did the 4.8-p8 patching.
It is weird. After a reboot the box seems to be all right. After a while,
the mach
Just wanted to note that this problem seems to not be isolated.
I'm seeing similar problems with RELENG_4_8 cvsup dated 00:24 09/23/03
eastern US time. Machine loses routing, reboot brings things to normal
for a few hours.
I'm not going to implement the ARP security patch on any of my other
boxe
Udo Schweigert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
> I had a similar problem on two (out of 5) 4.8-p8 boxes. The only change
> between p7 and p8 was the arp-cache-security fix, so I think it's related to
> that.
I'm seeing the same thing going from p6 to p8.
On boot;
fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> If you have all the aliases on lo0 does it work ? i.e. just have
> x.y.z.33 on fxp0. However, another poster had a problem with a /20
> subnet. I wonder if its an incorrect mask calculation ?
Don't forget the bit of randomness that's part of the game,
as it appears, at l
If you have all the aliases on lo0 does it work ? i.e. just have x.y.z.33
on fxp0. However, another poster had a problem with a /20 subnet. I wonder
if its an incorrect mask calculation ?
---Mike
At 12:05 PM 24/09/2003, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
There are:
x.y.z/24 with one IP address, x
A "me too" on 1 of 3 machines. Had to get my collocation people to power
cycle it several times before it came up correctly.
I also had a RELENG_5_1 machine not come up after the update, but I'm not
sure if that was related.
Jon Noack
___
[EMAIL PROTEC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:42 AM
To: Pawel Malachowski
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [full build as of Sept. 24] "No route to host" after certain
time...
Hi, can y
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:42:14AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Hi, can you clarify that
>
> >My rc.local script is something like:
> >LAN0=fxp0
> >IP=192.168.x.y
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${IP}/24
> >route add default 192.168.x.1
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${A}/28
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet ad
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 22:21:28 +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have built world and kernel from -STABLE as of today (Sept. 24th).
> All seems to work well, but after a certain time (maybe hours, don't
> know really), the internet connection breaks.
>
Now i tested with my -stable sys
Hi, can you clarify that
My rc.local script is something like:
LAN0=fxp0
IP=192.168.x.y
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${IP}/24
route add default 192.168.x.1
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${A}/28
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${B}/32
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${C}/32
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${D}/32
# A, B, C
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> What if you alias those IP address to lo0 ? Does it correct the problem ?
I've moved all /32 addresses from fxp0 to lo0, it doesn't fix the problem.
After first reboot route table was complete, however after second reboot
default rou
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 22:21:28 +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> When I reboot, all is okay again.
>
> Any ideas what has caused this in the new build?
> What should I do to investigate further?
>
I had a similar problem on two (out of 5) 4.8-p8 boxes. The only change
between p7 and p8 was the arp-ca
12 matches
Mail list logo
