Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-03 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 09:08 -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:00:27 +0100 > Bas Smeelen wrote: > > > Though the last 10 years I have not had the inconvenience of having to > > deal with long fsck' s or bgfsck' s on servers or workstation installs, > > so I think this should not

Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-03 Thread Mark Felder
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:00:27 +0100 Bas Smeelen wrote: > Though the last 10 years I have not had the inconvenience of having to > deal with long fsck' s or bgfsck' s on servers or workstation installs, > so I think this should not be default on new installs. This is one man's opinion. On the oth

Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-02 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:41:31PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > > On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > > > On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > > >>

Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-02 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 11/02/2012 07:59 PM, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:41:31PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: >>> On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Ad

Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-02 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 11/02/2012 07:41 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: >> On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: >>> On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: > On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote: >

Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-02 Thread Gary Palmer
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:41:31PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > > On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > >> On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: > > >>> On 11/3/2012 0:13,

Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-02 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > >> On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: > >>> On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote: > You can disable SU+J after installing, though

[patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

2012-11-02 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: >> On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: >>> On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote: You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the installer gave you a choice. >>> This assu