On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:30:20PM -0800, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
On 26 Dec 2001, at 19:56, William Carrel boldly uttered:
Using switch settings to obtain this sort of configuration/protection is
at best crude. Try dummynet(4) and/or some QoS capable network
hardware.
The switches
Well, having followed this thread for some bit, I gotta throw my $.02
worth in.. I'm one of those who has machines connected via a dumb
10baseT hub, and auto everything doesn't work. I think the whole point
is that a certain amount of knowledge is required *before* one should
attempt to build a
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
Well, having followed this thread for some bit, I gotta throw my $.02
worth in.. I'm one of those who has machines connected via a dumb
10baseT hub, and auto everything
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:22:15PM -0800, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it kind of strange that
auto-sensing/auto-negotiating must be enabled on both sides for the feature
to work a bit strange?
At home, I have a Netgear FS116, a 16-Port unmanaged
At 02:22 PM 12/26/2001 -0800, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it kind of strange that
auto-sensing/auto-negotiating must be enabled on both sides for the feature
to work a bit strange?
You can't just put that slash there and treat the two things the same
PROTECTED], Allen Landsidel [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:22:15PM -0800, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it kind of strange that
auto-sensing/auto-negotiating
PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
I apologize if I'm off. But it seems you guys are talking about improving
FBSD 4.5 networking performance.
I am currently using FreeBSD 4.4 Release. It works
i would like to get my notebook,which hangs on boot (pcic), to run again
with freebsd. was there any recent changes or any hints how i could get
around that problem? (the problem was posted with KAPOK in the subject).
--
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
Karl M. Joch
To
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Peter Ong wrote:
I apologize if I'm off. But it seems you guys are talking about
improving FBSD 4.5 networking performance.
I am currently using FreeBSD 4.4 Release. It works great, but there is
that one problem Samba. I like Samba because it's functional. I don't
PROTECTED]
Cc: Murray Stokely [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Nevermind wrote:
Hello, Murray Stokely!
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:30:37PM
: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nevermind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Murray Stokely [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Nevermind wrote
Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Nevermind wrote:
Hello, Murray Stokely!
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:30:37PM -0800, you wrote:
There were some problems with the network performance of FreeBSD 4.4
that were never discovered
PRERELEASE - Call for testing
I apologize if I'm off. But it seems you guys are talking about improving
FBSD 4.5 networking performance.
Ooc, are you using samba 2.2.1 or 2.2.2+? There were oplock problems with the
2.2.1 release which caused eratic behavior on low-traffic systems as well
13 matches
Mail list logo
