Re: 5.3-RELEASE kde 3.3 and pf

2004-11-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2004-Nov-10 09:22:39 -0500, Michael Butler wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >> Maybe you should allow everything on lo0, in and out. > >127/8 should always be allowed on the loopback interface, >127/8 should always be dropped from all other interfaces. > >I am "uncom

Re: 5.3-RELEASE kde 3.3 and pf

2004-11-10 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Maybe you should allow everything on lo0, in and out. 127/8 should always be allowed on the loopback interface, 127/8 should always be dropped from all other interfaces. I am "uncomfortable" saying that everything should be allowed .. Michael Butl

Re: 5.3-RELEASE kde 3.3 and pf

2004-11-10 Thread Olivier Tharan
* Gunnar Flygt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20041110 14:48): > What is it that makes KDE so slow when using pf with these simple rules. > Have I missed something? Maybe you should allow everything on lo0, in and out. -- olive ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: 5.3-RELEASE kde 3.3 and pf

2004-11-10 Thread Gunnar Flygt
I reply to my own question. Since I found out it was pf causing this I started to use tcpdump on pflog0 and found that traffic from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 was blocked. So I added as in the examples for ipf : # allow localhost pass in quick on lo0 pass out quick on lo0 after the antispoof rule in

5.3-RELEASE kde 3.3 and pf

2004-11-10 Thread Gunnar Flygt
I've had problems with DKE 3.3 since I upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE. I compared the same machine (Dell Latitude D600) with a different HD where Gentoo Linux (Sorry for that:) resides. Om the Gentto box KDE 3.3 starts promply from kdm, no extra delays, but with FreeBSD 5.3 it takes about 2 minutes to get