Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:57:53AM +1000, Robert Backhaus wrote:
[ ... ]
Simply because not every port works with -O2 optimisations. It caused
bad code in some circumstances.
Is there an automated way to identify those ports so they can be forced
not to use -O higer than
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:57:05AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:57:53AM +1000, Robert Backhaus wrote:
[ ... ]
Simply because not every port works with -O2 optimisations. It caused
bad code in some circumstances.
Is there an automated way to
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Even if the identification can't be done automatically, it still seems
like it would be good to start identifying ports that don't support -O
by hand, and having the ports force a correct -O setting. Most ports
support -O2 (if not -O3), and it would be nice if people could
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:41:37 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:09:47 +0200 Rene Ladan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 04:30:19PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
As for 5.x notes about -O2 (libalias, gcc) were removed at revision
1.229.2.7 of
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:57:53AM +1000, Robert Backhaus wrote:
Kernel and world seem to be ok with -O2, for ports it is not advised.
Hi,
I may have missed a thread or something (just let me know :) ) - why is
-O2 not advised for ports on 6.0?
cheers,
Beto
Simply because not
Rene Ladan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 04:30:19PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi!
As for 5.x notes about -O2 (libalias, gcc) were removed at revision
1.229.2.7 of /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf. But for 6.0-BETA3
we do have these warnings. Should they be removed as for 5.x? Is it
Kernel and world seem to be ok with -O2, for ports it is not advised.
Hi,
I may have missed a thread or something (just let me know :) ) - why is
-O2 not advised for ports on 6.0?
cheers,
Beto
Simply because not every port works with -O2 optimisations. It caused
bad code in some
Hi!
As for 5.x notes about -O2 (libalias, gcc) were removed at revision
1.229.2.7 of /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf. But for 6.0-BETA3
we do have these warnings. Should they be removed as for 5.x? Is it
safe to use -O2 to build/install kernel, world, ports fro 6.0?
WBR
--
bsam
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 04:30:19PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi!
As for 5.x notes about -O2 (libalias, gcc) were removed at revision
1.229.2.7 of /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf. But for 6.0-BETA3
we do have these warnings. Should they be removed as for 5.x? Is it
safe to use
