On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > > > On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > > On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 9.8.2010 17:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> >> I'm going to try 7.3-RELEASE today, just to make sure that this isn't a
> >> regression of some
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 18:11, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> > I thought Intel VT-d was supposed to help address things like this?
>
> Probably -
> http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3/2-io/7-conclusion.htm
> says it should help unmodified gue
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > >> > On Sat,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:11:24AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> FWIW, Workstation 7.1 is fairly adamant about stating "if you want
> faster disk I/O, pre-allocate the disk space rather than let disk use
> grow dynamically". I've never tested this however.
Anecdotal, as I have no comparative pe
On 9 August 2010 18:11, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I thought Intel VT-d was supposed to help address things like this?
Probably - http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3/2-io/7-conclusion.htm
says it should help unmodified guests, but I don't know for sure. I do
know that Nehalems run faste
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>
> >> >> It's unlikely
On 9.8.2010 17:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> I'm going to try 7.3-RELEASE today, just to make sure that this isn't a
>> regression of some kind. It seems from reading other posts that this used to
>> wor
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>> On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>> >> It's unlikely they will help, but try:
>> >>
>> >> vfs.read_max=32
>> >>
>> >> for read
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> >> It's unlikely they will help, but try:
> >>
> >> vfs.read_max=32
> >>
> >> for read speeds (but test using the UFS file system, not as a ra
On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> It's unlikely they will help, but try:
>>
>> vfs.read_max=32
>>
>> for read speeds (but test using the UFS file system, not as a raw device
>> like above), and:
>>
>> vfs.hirunningspace=8388608
>> v
On 7.8.2010 3:21, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm experiencing slow write speeds on 8-STABLE running on an ESXI 4.0
> server, despite whatever tunables I've thrown at it. Read speeds are slower
> than they should be, but acceptable. Note, this is a thick provisioned disk,
> not thin.
>
> Spee
Hello,
I'm experiencing slow write speeds on 8-STABLE running on an ESXI 4.0
server, despite whatever tunables I've thrown at it. Read speeds are slower
than they should be, but acceptable. Note, this is a thick provisioned disk,
not thin.
Speeds on Windows hosts are as expected for an MD3000 DAS
14 matches
Mail list logo