On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's unlikely they will help, but try:
vfs.read_max=32
for read speeds (but test using
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's unlikely they will help, but
On 9.8.2010 17:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'm going to try 7.3-RELEASE today, just to make sure that this isn't a
regression of some kind. It seems from reading other
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan
On 9 August 2010 18:11, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
I thought Intel VT-d was supposed to help address things like this?
Probably - http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3/2-io/7-conclusion.htm
says it should help unmodified guests, but I don't know for sure. I do
know
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:11:24AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
FWIW, Workstation 7.1 is fairly adamant about stating if you want
faster disk I/O, pre-allocate the disk space rather than let disk use
grow dynamically. I've never tested this however.
Anecdotal, as I have no comparative
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 August 2010
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9 August 2010 18:11, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
I thought Intel VT-d was supposed to help address things like this?
Probably -
http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3/2-io/7-conclusion.htm
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9.8.2010 17:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'm going to try 7.3-RELEASE today, just to make sure
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 7.8.2010 3:21, Joshua Boyd wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing slow write speeds on 8-STABLE running on an ESXI 4.0
server, despite whatever tunables I've thrown at it. Read speeds are slower
than they should be, but acceptable. Note, this is a thick provisioned disk,
not thin.
Speeds on
On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's unlikely they will help, but try:
vfs.read_max=32
for read speeds (but test using the UFS file system, not as a raw device
like above), and:
Hello,
I'm experiencing slow write speeds on 8-STABLE running on an ESXI 4.0
server, despite whatever tunables I've thrown at it. Read speeds are slower
than they should be, but acceptable. Note, this is a thick provisioned disk,
not thin.
Speeds on Windows hosts are as expected for an MD3000
14 matches
Mail list logo
