On Friday 05 February 2010 9:00:51 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Randi Harper wrote:
> > Marian Hettwer wrote:
> > > +1 vote for making / bigger.
> > > At least a size where a make installkernel runs through.
> >
> > This is going to happen. It's been on my to-do list for a while, as I
> > find
Randi Harper wrote:
> Marian Hettwer wrote:
> > +1 vote for making / bigger.
> > At least a size where a make installkernel runs through.
>
> This is going to happen. It's been on my to-do list for a while, as I
> find it increasingly annoying. The default sizes of all mount points
> need t
Hi Randi,
On 02/03/10 02:43, Randi Harper wrote:
This is going to happen. It's been on my to-do list for a while, as I
find it increasingly annoying. The default sizes of all mount points
need to be tweaked a bit. Be patient, there will be some new changes
going into sysinstall very soon.
Grea
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
>> 512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
>>
on 29/01/2010 16:33 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
>
> The *.symbols files I have for the kernel are installed in /boot/kernel.
> I'm referring to "stuff" in /usr/obj which appears to be required to
> debug a crash (vmcore). What I'm describing is even mentioned in the
> FreeBSD Developers H
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 04:25:27PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/01/2010 15:40 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:29:51PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> I don't think you need them unless remote debugging and
on 29/01/2010 15:40 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:29:51PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Ruben de Groot wrote:
I don't think you need them unless remote debugging and in that
case you are multiuser (I would have thought anyway).
>>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:29:51PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> > > I don't think you need them unless remote debugging and in that
> > > case you are multiuser (I would have thought anyway).
> > >
> > > If they went into /usr then /boot could remain
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> > I don't think you need them unless remote debugging and in that
> > case you are multiuser (I would have thought anyway).
> >
> > If they went into /usr then /boot could remain slim.
>
> But what if you have /usr on a gmirror, glabel, zfs filesystem or
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:43:49PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor typed:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:23:28AM +, Adrian Wontroba typed:
> > > I concur that the 235 MB size of an amd64 8.0 kernel is a bit of a
> > > surprise. An i386 kernel is a mere 135 MB
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:20:54PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Also, at the start of this thread, the OP said that he did a buildkernel
> and a buildworld. This is broken and may produce a non-bootable
> kernel. Always buildworld and then buildkernel so that the new toolchain
> is used to bu
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:41:59 -0600
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> add the following to /etc/make.conf:
> INSTALL_NODEBUG=yes
This is useful. Thanks!
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> Why you are suggesting /var >= 2*RAM? Is it just for saving crash dumps
> or anything else? And why so big /tmp? I am running servers with smaller
> sizes for years without any problem.
Me too. I usually set up a small memory disk for /tmp.
I neve
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
buildworld (no custom kernel, no make.conf).
Instaling the new kernel failed, since /boot/kernel/
On Sat, January 23, 2010 8:35 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:20:54 -0800
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> Just for the record and to avoid further confusion, building a kernel
>> with debug symbols does not take any more space in root. Another copy of
>> the kernel is built but
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:20:54 -0800
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Just for the record and to avoid further confusion, building a kernel
> with debug symbols does not take any more space in root. Another copy of
> the kernel is built but not installed into /kernel. The copy of the kernel
> in /kernel is a
> From: Steven Friedrich
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:20:30 -0500
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> On Friday 22 January 2010 06:32:02 pm Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:56:31PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
> > > in your /etc/make.conf, do you
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:21:48PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:04:57PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
...
> > And why so big /tmp? I am running servers with smaller sizes for years
> > without any problem.
>
> My recommendation above doesn'
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
2) I tend to keep a large amount of logs on systems, going back weeks if
not months. This is intentional; it's amazing how often a customer or
user will ask for some information from 3 or 4 months prior.
FreeBSD's Apache port out-of-the-box logs to /var/log/httpd-
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:04:57PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >While I'm here, I figure I'd share how I end up partitioning most of the
> >server systems I maintain. I use this general "formula" when building a
> >new system, unless it's a 4-disk box (s
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
While I'm here, I figure I'd share how I end up partitioning most of the
server systems I maintain. I use this general "formula" when building a
new system, unless it's a 4-disk box (see bottom of mail):
ad4s1a = /= UFS2= 1GB
ad4s1b = swap = (2*R
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:43:49PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> > To be a little more precise: it's not the >kernel< that is so big.
> > It's all the (mostly not needed) modules and symbol files that fill
> > up /
>
> Maybe they could be put somewher
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:23:28AM +, Adrian Wontroba typed:
> > I concur that the 235 MB size of an amd64 8.0 kernel is a bit of a
> > surprise. An i386 kernel is a mere 135 MB. IMO increasing the
> > sysinstall default root slice size for at least
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:23:28AM +, Adrian Wontroba typed:
> I concur that the 235 MB size of an amd64 8.0 kernel is a bit of a
> surprise. An i386 kernel is a mere 135 MB. IMO increasing the sysinstall
> default root slice size for at least amd64 would be a good thing.
To be a little more
On Friday 22 January 2010 06:32:02 pm Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:56:31PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
> > in your /etc/make.conf, do you have a line like:
> > makeoptions DEBUG=-g
> > if so, comment it out.
>
> The GENEREIC kernel by default has the followin
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
>
> I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
> 512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
> buildworld (no custom kernel, no make.conf).
>
> Instaling the new kernel
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:56:31PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
> in your /etc/make.conf, do you have a line like:
> makeoptions DEBUG=-g
> if so, comment it out.
The GENEREIC kernel by default has the following config:
makeoptions DEBUG=-g# Build kernel with gdb(1) d
On Friday 22 January 2010 11:46:01 am Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100
>
> Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> > Instaling the new kernel failed, since /boot/kernel/ is already well
> > over 230 MBytes in size. moving that to kernel.old and writing a new one
> > with about t
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
> > 512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buil
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> Instaling the new kernel failed, since /boot/kernel/ is already well
> over 230 MBytes in size. moving that to kernel.old and writing a new one
> with about the same size fails due to no space left on device.
>
> This is not a que
Hi All,
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
> 512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
> buildworld (no custom kernel, no make.conf).
>
> Instaling the ne
Hi,
I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
buildworld (no custom kernel, no make.conf).
Instaling the new kernel failed, since /boot/kernel/ is already well
over 230 MBytes in size. moving
32 matches
Mail list logo
