On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:12:05PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Would it be possible for the next 9.x release to set hw.memtest.tests="0"
> when we discover we're under a hypervisor to avoid doing the tests? (or
> default it to 0 in the installer kernel?)?
Actually, that's already been fixed, an
On 5/16/2012 8:04 AM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 5/16/2012 8:12, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Ok, I'm just impatient. I let it sit, and it eventually came up.
Would it be possible for the next 9.x release to set
hw.memtest.tests="0"
when we discover we're under a hypervisor to avoid doing the tests? (or
On 5/16/2012 22:05, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I believe this is due to the 8G of memory I put on it. (I like to build
big VM's.
It's directly proportional to the size of the VM.
Ahh! Yeah I rarely build a VM with more than a gig or two here in the
office (ie; where I use Workstation).
On Wed, May 16, 2012 10:04 am, Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 5/16/2012 8:12, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> Ok, I'm just impatient. I let it sit, and it eventually came up.
>>
>> Would it be possible for the next 9.x release to set
>> hw.memtest.tests="0"
>> when we discover we're under a hypervisor to avoid
On 5/16/2012 8:12, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Ok, I'm just impatient. I let it sit, and it eventually came up.
Would it be possible for the next 9.x release to set hw.memtest.tests="0"
when we discover we're under a hypervisor to avoid doing the tests? (or
default it to 0 in the installer kernel?)?
Ok, I'm just impatient. I let it sit, and it eventually came up.
Would it be possible for the next 9.x release to set hw.memtest.tests="0"
when we discover we're under a hypervisor to avoid doing the tests? (or
default it to 0 in the installer kernel?)?
On Tue, May 15, 2012 9:49 am, Larry Rosen
On 5/15/2012 21:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
This is VMWare Workstation 8.0.3 booting off the release ISO.
Ideas?
Is this the installer that doesn't boot or is it the OS after you've
installed?
If its the former you might just have a bad ISO download. Have/did you
verified the checksum of the
This is VMWare Workstation 8.0.3 booting off the release ISO.
Ideas?
On Tue, May 15, 2012 12:59 am, Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 5/14/2012 22:18, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> Is there a known issue with 9.0-RELEASE on amd64 VMWare Workstation?
>
> Since nobody has chimed in I felt I should:
>
> I use Free
This is VMWare Workstation 8.0.3 booting off the release ISO.
Ideas?
On Tue, May 15, 2012 12:59 am, Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 5/14/2012 22:18, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> Is there a known issue with 9.0-RELEASE on amd64 VMWare Workstation?
>
> Since nobody has chimed in I felt I should:
>
> I use Free
Did you tried disabling acpi to check? I had a similar problem, not
with FreeBSD, but with DragonflyBSD.
On 5/15/12, Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 5/14/2012 22:18, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> Is there a known issue with 9.0-RELEASE on amd64 VMWare Workstation?
>
> Since nobody has chimed in I felt I shoul
On 5/14/2012 22:18, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Is there a known issue with 9.0-RELEASE on amd64 VMWare Workstation?
Since nobody has chimed in I felt I should:
I use FreeBSD 9.0 routinely under VMWare Workstation without issue (my
current VMWare Workstation version is 8.0.0 which is slightly out o
Is there a known issue with 9.0-RELEASE on amd64 VMWare Workstation?
I tried to build a new VM on my new Lenovo W520 Laptop (Windows 7
Pro/64-Bit, 16G ram) and it gets to the Beastie menu, and times out, then
dies.
Any ideas?
What can I provide?
And, is there an issue with 9 in general, or coul
12 matches
Mail list logo
