About zfs + nfs stability

2010-08-31 Thread Giulio Ferro
I have a 8.0 stable (last build around April 2010) which I use as a nfs server : amd64, 8GB RAM, ~7TB storage. I had a lot of grief with the (sadly) well know kmem map too small bug, which really compromised the quality of the service that server was deputed to. There wasn't (and there still

Re: About zfs + nfs stability

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
On 08/31/2010 09:21, Giulio Ferro wrote: 1) Is it a good idea to upgrade this production system to the latest 8 stable (8.1 stable I believe)? Is it really stable? For this question alone, I can verify that it is stable to upgrade to the stable branch. Though on one hand it might be reasonable

Re: About zfs + nfs stability

2010-08-31 Thread Rick Macklem
The freezes are gone, thankfully, but I often get huge slow-downs: looking in the logs of the nfs clients I get plenty of: ... kernel: nfs server ...:/path/to/dir: lockd not responding ... kernel: nfs server ...:/path/to/dir: lockd is alive again If you don't need file locking to work