Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-04-13 Thread Phillip N.
Im getting the following on Releng_6 from Apr 4. Is this related to the areca driver? thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WORM]# kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.0 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol ps_pglobal_lookup]

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-04-13 Thread Scott Long
Phillip N. wrote: Im getting the following on Releng_6 from Apr 4. Is this related to the areca driver? thanks. It's not directly coming from the areca driver. It could be that there is some memory or disk corruption that is triggering these panics, but that's just a wild guess. Scott

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-31 Thread KillFill
El vie, 30-03-2007 a las 17:09 -0500, Nikolas Britton escribió: Have you tried making it crash? Well, i have the same process running in cron as i did before, and it not crashing.. raidtest seem to run just fine[1] Maybe you could recomend me a better stress case.. [1] raid5 device: Read

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-30 Thread Phillip Neumann
El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 10:11 -0600, Scott Long escribió: Please try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver sources: http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/arcmsr.simq.diff. Scott Just in case you mind, the problem does not seem to be present with the patch. Havent had crash

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-30 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 3/30/07, Phillip Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 10:11 -0600, Scott Long escribió: Please try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver sources: http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/arcmsr.simq.diff. Scott Just in case you mind, the problem does not

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-30 Thread Scott Long
Nikolas Britton wrote: On 3/30/07, Phillip Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 10:11 -0600, Scott Long escribió: Please try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver sources: http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/arcmsr.simq.diff. Scott Just in case you

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-30 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 3/30/07, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolas Britton wrote: On 3/30/07, Phillip Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 10:11 -0600, Scott Long escribió: Please try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver sources:

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-30 Thread Scott Long
Nikolas Britton wrote: On 3/30/07, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolas Britton wrote: On 3/30/07, Phillip Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 10:11 -0600, Scott Long escribió: Please try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver sources:

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-26 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 3/25/07, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolas Britton wrote: Yeah are hardware is nearly identical. I don't remember what I did to my custom driver, I know I fixed some syntax errors and merged in changes that were made on top of the 1.20.00.02 code base. I'm not sure but I think

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-26 Thread Phillip Neumann
El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 10:11 -0600, Scott Long escribió: Nikolas Britton wrote: Yeah are hardware is nearly identical. I don't remember what I did to my custom driver, I know I fixed some syntax errors and merged in changes that were made on top of the 1.20.00.02 code base. I'm not sure

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-25 Thread Scott Long
Nikolas Britton wrote: Yeah are hardware is nearly identical. I don't remember what I did to my custom driver, I know I fixed some syntax errors and merged in changes that were made on top of the 1.20.00.02 code base. I'm not sure but I think most of those changes were thrown out with the import

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-24 Thread KillFill
El vie, 23-03-2007 a las 21:01 -0500, Nikolas Britton escribió: A newer version of the driver has been release to fix this problem (I think): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/arcmsr/ If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-24 Thread Scott Long
KillFill wrote: El vie, 23-03-2007 a las 21:01 -0500, Nikolas Britton escribió: A newer version of the driver has been release to fix this problem (I think): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/arcmsr/ If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12:

RE: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-24 Thread Jan Mikkelsen
Hi, Nikolas Britton wrote: If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/ I could consistently make 1.20.00.12 corrupt data. If you are going to go back, that's probably a bad choice. 1.20.00.02 didn't seem to have corruption problems. Regards,

RE: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-24 Thread Jan Mikkelsen
KillFill wrote: Are you sudgesting to newfs FS's? Yes, using the 1.20.00.14 driver (ie: from 6-STABLE). I don't know whether the corruption is coming from the current driver, or from blocks the previous driver wrote. Doing a newfs will help if the corrupt blocks came from the previous driver.

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-24 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 3/24/07, Jan Mikkelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Nikolas Britton wrote: If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/ I could consistently make 1.20.00.12 corrupt data. If you are going to go back, that's probably a bad choice. 1.20.00.02

RE: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-24 Thread Jan Mikkelsen
Nikolas Britton wrote: On 3/24/07, Jan Mikkelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Nikolas Britton wrote: If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/ I could consistently make 1.20.00.12 corrupt data. If you are going to go back,

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-24 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 3/24/07, Jan Mikkelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolas Britton wrote: On 3/24/07, Jan Mikkelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Nikolas Britton wrote: If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/ I could consistently make 1.20.00.12

RE: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-23 Thread KillFill
Hello... El vie, 23-03-2007 a las 11:12 +1100, Jan Mikkelsen escribió: Hi, Phillip Neumann wrote: My amd64 box is not very stable. In its hardware list, you can see there is an areca 1210 card, wich suffer the errata of 6.2-release (high load crash) Last week or so, i saw a

Re: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-23 Thread Nikolas Britton
A newer version of the driver has been release to fix this problem (I think): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/arcmsr/ If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12: http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/ Added erich and scott to the cc list. On 3/22/07, Phillip Neumann

Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-22 Thread Phillip Neumann
Dear FreeBSD-stable... My amd64 box is not very stable. In its hardware list, you can see there is an areca 1210 card, wich suffer the errata of 6.2-release (high load crash) Last week or so, i saw a commit where the areca bugs were fixed, so i updated the system. I can still see the

RE: Amd64 Unstable Areca

2007-03-22 Thread Jan Mikkelsen
Hi, Phillip Neumann wrote: My amd64 box is not very stable. In its hardware list, you can see there is an areca 1210 card, wich suffer the errata of 6.2-release (high load crash) Last week or so, i saw a commit where the areca bugs were fixed, so i updated the system. I can still see