On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Peter C. Lai wrote:
> > What happens when you portupgrade? You will have to deal with rebuilding
> > that part of world?
>
> Not unless the shared library version number changes, that's the
> beauty of shared libraries.
Unfortunatly w
Peter C. Lai wrote:
> What happens when you portupgrade? You will have to deal with rebuilding
> that part of world?
Not unless the shared library version number changes, that's the
beauty of shared libraries.
Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailin
What happens when you portupgrade? You will have to deal with rebuilding
that part of world?
On 2009-09-24 03:37:45PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Peter C. Lai wrote:
> > It's probably a bad idea to link a binary in base with a library from
> > ports...
>
> What is the reasoning behind this state
Peter C. Lai wrote:
> It's probably a bad idea to link a binary in base with a library from ports...
What is the reasoning behind this statement?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
It's probably a bad idea to link a binary in base with a library from ports...
security/heimdal has a WITH_LDAP make knob which should do what you want?
I'm not sure if it has OVERRIDE_BASE, though.
On 2009-09-23 03:02:43PM +0300, George Mamalakis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if there i
Hi all,
I was wondering if there is a way to build fbsd's basesystem heimdal
with openldap support. I saw that /usr/src/kerberos5/Makefile.inc has a
section starting with .if defined(WITH_OPENLDAP), so I built the world
with the flag -DWITH_OPENLDAP. What I managed was to link the kdc binary
