Re: Changes to man page in 4.5-R?

2002-03-04 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 05:14:18PM +0200, * Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:02:36AM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > * On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:29:26PM -0800, > > * Murray Stokely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This means man(1) can no longer creat

Re: Changes to man page in 4.5-R?

2002-03-04 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:02:36AM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:29:26PM -0800, > * Murray Stokely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This means man(1) can no longer create system catpages on a > > regular user's behalf. (It is still able to if the user has > >

Re: Changes to man page in 4.5-R?

2002-01-16 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:04:19AM +0200, Nevermind wrote: > Hello, Murray Stokely! > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:29:26PM -0800, you wrote: > > > This change was just committed to -CURRENT within the last 24 hours. > > I posted a message to -qa about this earlier today. It will most > > like

Re: Changes to man page in 4.5-R?

2002-01-16 Thread Nevermind
Hello, Murray Stokely! On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:29:26PM -0800, you wrote: > This change was just committed to -CURRENT within the last 24 hours. > I posted a message to -qa about this earlier today. It will most > likely be approved for MFC shortly. Ruslan's commit message does a > good jo

Re: Changes to man page in 4.5-R?

2002-01-15 Thread Murray Stokely
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 12:29:45AM -0500, Steven Huwig wrote: > I was reading the QA guidelines at > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.5R/qa.html, and I was wondering what > the following statement (second bullet from bottom) means: > > * Once the man page change goes in (which I think it shoul

Changes to man page in 4.5-R?

2002-01-15 Thread Steven Huwig
Hello, I was reading the QA guidelines at http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.5R/qa.html, and I was wondering what the following statement (second bullet from bottom) means: * Once the man page change goes in (which I think it should) we'll want some basic testing of the man command. What is th