> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Mueller
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dell 1950 does not properly respond to reboot and
shutdown -p
>
&g
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 15:16 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Olivier Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Btw, it would be nice if the patched if_bce.c could also be integrated
> > into the cvs (http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/if_bce.c). At the moment (beg.
> > of the week) I still had to patc
In response to Olivier Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Btw, it would be nice if the patched if_bce.c could also be integrated
> into the cvs (http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/if_bce.c). At the moment (beg.
> of the week) I still had to patch the source tree by hand to keep the
> network
> interface
Le 12 oct. 06 à 18:03, Bill Moran a écrit :
There isn't really a "patch" per-se. Just a bunch of recommendations
on where to put extra debugging information. You'll find it in the
archives.
ok thanks, I'll check.
Btw, it would be nice if the patched if_bce.c could also be
integrated
into t
In response to Olivier Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I would be happy to test & help, I also have a PE1950 around waiting for
> this problem to be solved to go in production. I would just need to
> have
> the patch. (I'll check the list archive later, I just joined
> freebsd-stable today
Le 12 oct. 06 à 17:00, Bill Moran a écrit :
In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The device_printf() function take too much time I think, so you
get the same
behaviour as the DELAY().
True. Problem is that I considered that possibility, and removed the
device_printf(), rebuild t
In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:53:15PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > John Baldwin writes:
> > > | On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > | > In response to Doug Ambrisko <[
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:53:15PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > John Baldwin writes:
> > | On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
> > | > In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > | > > Bruno Ducrot writes:
> > | > > |
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 13:20, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> John Baldwin writes:
> | On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
> | > In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | > > Bruno Ducrot writes:
> | > > | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> | > > |
In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> John Baldwin writes:
> | On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
> | > In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | > > Bruno Ducrot writes:
> | > > | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> | > > | > In
John Baldwin writes:
| On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
| > In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| > > Bruno Ducrot writes:
| > > | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| > > | > In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| > > | > > Hi,
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Bruno Ducrot writes:
> > | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > | > In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > | > > Hi,
> > | > >
> > | > > On Wed, Oct
In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bruno Ducrot writes:
> | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> | > In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | > > Hi,
> | > >
> | > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> | > > >
> | > >
Bruno Ducrot writes:
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| > In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| > > Hi,
| > >
| > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| > > >
| > > > A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits ther
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > >
> > > A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
> > > shutdown screen.
> >
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on
the shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the
power button cleanly shuts down the OS)
I'm posting this to stable@,
In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
> > shutdown screen.
> >
> > A shutdown -p does the same.
>
> What exactly are the last few line
In response to Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Bill Moran wrote:
> >>
> >>> A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
> >>> shutdown screen.
> >>>
> >>> A shutdown -p does the same
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 12:42, Guy Helmer wrote:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Bill Moran wrote:
> >>> A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits
> >>> there on the shutdown screen.
> >>>
> >>> A shutdown -p does the same.
> >>>
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
> shutdown screen.
>
> A shutdown -p does the same.
What exactly are the last few lines?
> Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the power
button cle
In response to Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
> > shutdown screen.
> >
> > A shutdown -p does the same.
> >
> > Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the power
> > button clea
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the power
button cleanly shuts down the OS)
I'm posting this to stable@, but the same behaviou
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the power
button cleanly shuts down the OS)
I'm posting this to stable@, but the same behaviour occurs with FreeB
24 matches
Mail list logo
