Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DO NOT EVEN CONSIDER STARTING THIS THREAD!!! It's been hashed
Double gah. Forget I said anything. ;)
However, just ranting about this problem[0] won't accomplish anything
other then wasting a lot of time and energy, IMO. There's plenty of
historic
* Bruce A. Mah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If memory serves me right, Aragon Gouveia wrote:
Slightly off topic...
I just upgraded an fbsd machine of mine to 4.6-PRERELEASE (RELENG_4). What
does prerelease mean in FreeBSD terms?
Isn't this in the FAQ somewhere? If not, it should be. :-)
On Friday 03 May 2002 02:37 am, Dave Hayes wrote:
|
|
| All this dovetails with something I expressed earlier, with regards to
| annotating documentation. Somehow, this community needs to be able to
| process a certan class of ideas in a format other than linear mailing
| lists. Perhaps some sort
From the handbook, which really is meant to be the first thing that is to be
read before using cvsup?
In terms of FreeBSD, the convention is the following:
FreeBSD-STABLE is our development branch from which major releases are
made. Changes go into this branch at a different pace, and with the
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:03:24PM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
I'm sure you folks hashed this all over before, but really...calling a
branch -stable when it really isn't is not good semantic practice
IMNSHO.
DO NOT EVEN CONSIDER STARTING THIS THREAD!!! It's
