On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:19:49PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
>
> > CVS today. Dual Opteron running
> >5.3-STABLE #3: Tue Nov 30 01:44:05 EST 2004
> >
> > Following the instructions in UPDATING, I get the following,
> > indicating a bad kernel. 2
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:12:04 -0600
> From: Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:42:29 -0500, Michael R. Wayne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2) More importantly, I recovered by loading /boot/kernel.old/kernel
> > and the box is up BUT I am
Hi, Michael,
å 2005-01-19äç 16:42 -0500ïMichael R. Wayneåéï
> 2) More importantly, I recovered by loading /boot/kernel.old/kernel
>and the box is up BUT I am concerned that the NEXT time that I
>do "make installkernel" I'll stomp on kernel.old losing this fallback
>procedure. I can ce
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:42:29 -0500, Michael R. Wayne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) More importantly, I recovered by loading /boot/kernel.old/kernel
> and the box is up BUT I am concerned that the NEXT time that I
> do "make installkernel" I'll stomp on kernel.old losing this fallback
> proc
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
> CVS today. Dual Opteron running
>5.3-STABLE #3: Tue Nov 30 01:44:05 EST 2004
>
> Following the instructions in UPDATING, I get the following,
> indicating a bad kernel. 2 questions:
>
> 1) Is this a known, corrected issue as of today? I ran ano
CVS today. Dual Opteron running
5.3-STABLE #3: Tue Nov 30 01:44:05 EST 2004
Following the instructions in UPDATING, I get the following,
indicating a bad kernel. 2 questions:
1) Is this a known, corrected issue as of today? I ran another
CVSUP and did not see any changed to src.
2) Mor
