Scott Long wrote:
Sorry, things got lost in the shuffle to get this released. For your
specific snapshot deadlocks, please test the changes that have gone into
7-CURRENT and report back if they fix your problem. Only with active
testing will we know if they are good to be backported in time fo
Chris wrote:
On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jonathan Noack wrote:
>> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
>> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues"
>> thing. It wa
On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jonathan Noack wrote:
>> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
>> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues"
>> thing. It was a long release
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jonathan Noack wrote:
>> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
>> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues"
>> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est
>> la vie. It'
J. T. farmer wrote:
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Jonathan Noack wrote:
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues"
thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est
la vie. It's always
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Jonathan Noack wrote:
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues"
thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est
la vie. It's always a good idea to check the
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Jonathan Noack wrote:
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues"
thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est
la vie. It's always a good idea to check t
Jonathan Noack wrote:
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues"
thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est
la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date vers
On 05/11/06 20:53, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
>> On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>>> Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata"
>>> Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems?
>>> Don
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent
reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that the
quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the
release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend al
On 2006.05.11 20:53:42 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> >On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> >
> >>Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>
> >[...]
> >
> >>>the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata"
> >>>
> >>Indeed. Where is the mention of current q
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
[...]
the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata"
Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't
tell me these will be shoved under the rug.
On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
[...]
> >the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata"
>
> Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't
> tell me these will be shoved under the rug.
Send patches.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
At 11:19 PM 08/05/2006, Scott Long wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development
of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements, man
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2006 01:00:14 -0400
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems?
Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug.
Oh, please.
Allow the team a few minutes (at least!) to get the righ
On Tue, 09 May 2006 01:00:14 -0400
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems?
> Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug.
Oh, please.
Allow the team a few minutes (at least!) to get the right
errata in place before complain
Julian Elischer wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the deve
Scott Long wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development
of the 6.X branc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development
of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements, many
bugfixes, and a few new features. These i
19 matches
Mail list logo
