On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:43:12PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:22:16 +0900
> Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think re(4) in CURRENT have fixed these issues.
> > Would you try re(4) in CURRENT?
>
> Perhaps I was being unclear; under FreeBSD 7.x
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:22:16 +0900
Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think re(4) in CURRENT have fixed these issues.
> Would you try re(4) in CURRENT?
Perhaps I was being unclear; under FreeBSD 7.x (RELENG_7) re(49 works
fine.
It is only &.3 that has problems with re(4).
--
Regards,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 01:48:36PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is anybody having stability problems with if_re under FreeBSD
> 6.3-stable?
> I know about PR kern/118719[1] but it doesn't look like the problem I'm
> having - at least my machine doesn't panic.
> My machine[2]
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:48:36 +0100
Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ouch! The machine just rebooted. Perhaps this is kern/118719 after
> all. Anything I can do to diagnose this problem further?
forget about the reboot - it was caused by my attempt at a workaround
(using a if_ural i
Hello!
Is anybody having stability problems with if_re under FreeBSD
6.3-stable?
I know about PR kern/118719[1] but it doesn't look like the problem I'm
having - at least my machine doesn't panic.
My machine[2] runs FreeBSD 6.3-stable / amd64:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
FreeBSD kg-vm.kg4.no 6.3-ST
