Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-06 Thread Chad R. Larson
As I recall, Steve Tremblett wrote: So a minor release happens when bugfixes reach a critical mass? Are there any actual new features in 4.3 or simply fixes on top of 4.2-RELEASE? Do features from -CURRENT get migrated in if they are deemed stable enough to ship? The releases happen more

Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-05 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote: On Wed, 04 Apr 2001 23:49:40 -0500 "Brian D. Woodruff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BW I would rather be consistent across my servers than have some be one BW release past the others. Allow me to investigate this a little

Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-05 Thread Ken Bolingbroke
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Brian D. Woodruff wrote: At 10:35 PM 4/4/01 -0400, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:32:39PM -0500, Brian D. Woodruff wrote: Here are my questions: 1.) is there a way to specify 4.2-STABLE, which is what I have been using? can anyone tell me how to get the

Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-05 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 05-Apr-2001 Ken Bolingbroke wrote: If you require absolute consistency across servers, you need to either update all servers from the very same source, or specify an exact CVS tag to get the same sources for all servers. You can check out a branch at a specific time using -D which you

RE: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-05 Thread Robert
There may be some value in the multiple servers case, of running one as a cvs server, and updating all the others off that one. Then all your servers are reflections of the one that is cvsupping the - remote-cvs-server just a thought. Bob On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Brian D. Woodruff wrote: At

Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-05 Thread Deven Kampenhout
I agree with you completely, Bob. The idea of keeping one "master server" to push out updates to many is extremely useful when you are maintaining a large number of similar systems. It is much less work-intensive to maintain several hundred systems if they are running on exactly the same

Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-05 Thread Ben Smithurst
Brian D. Woodruff wrote: At 10:35 PM 4/4/01 -0400, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:32:39PM -0500, Brian D. Woodruff wrote: Here are my questions: 1.) is there a way to specify 4.2-STABLE, which is what I have been using? excellent answer to part 2 can anyone tell me how to get

Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-05 Thread Bob Johnson
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 23:49:40 -0500 From: "Brian D. Woodruff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC At 10:35 PM 4/4/01 -0400, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:32:39PM -0500, Brian D. Woodruff wrote: Here are my question

Re: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC

2001-04-04 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001 23:49:40 -0500 "Brian D. Woodruff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BW I would rather be consistent across my servers than have some be one BW release past the others. Allow me to investigate this a little further. Do you want to have all your servers running the