Re: HAST + ZFS: no action on drive failure

2011-07-03 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:43:15 -0700 Timothy Smith wrote: TS> Hello Mikolaj, TS> So, just to be clear, if a local drive fails in my pool, but the TS> corresponding remote drive remains available, then hastd will both write to TS> and read from the remote drive? That's really very cool! Yes.

Re: HAST + ZFS: no action on drive failure

2011-07-02 Thread Timothy Smith
Hello Mikolaj, So, just to be clear, if a local drive fails in my pool, but the corresponding remote drive remains available, then hastd will both write to and read from the remote drive? That's really very cool! I looked more closely at the hastd(8) man page. There is some indication of what you

Re: HAST + ZFS: no action on drive failure

2011-07-02 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:02:19 -0700 Timothy Smith wrote: TS> First posting here, hopefully I'm doing it right =) TS> I also posted this to the FreeBSD forum, but I know some hast folks monitor TS> this list regularly and not so much there, so... TS> Basically, I'm testing failure scenarios w

HAST + ZFS: no action on drive failure

2011-06-30 Thread Timothy Smith
First posting here, hopefully I'm doing it right =) I also posted this to the FreeBSD forum, but I know some hast folks monitor this list regularly and not so much there, so... Basically, I'm testing failure scenarios with HAST/ZFS. I got two nodes, scripted up a bunch of checks and failover acti