On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in
> command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses, etc.
Changing the Subject (but keeping the thread ID reference), since the
original topic of dis
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> > Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in
> > command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses, etc.
>
> Changing the Subject (but keeping the thread ID reference), since the
> original
On Mar 5, 2008, at 17:31 , Mark Andrews wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
* The last I read about IPv6 in mainstream news, there were major
concerns cited over some of the security aspects of the protocol. I
also remember reading somewhere that IPv6 wa
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 17:31 , Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
>
> >>> * The last I read about IPv6 in mainstream news, there were major
> >> concern
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 17:31 , Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> >>> * The last I read about IPv6 in mainstream news, there were major
> >> concerns cited over some of the security aspects of the protocol. I
> >> also remember reading
Hi Jeremy,
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 08:01 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> * I'm not familiar with the intricacies of the protocol.
No better time (or way) to learn! Get going!
> * The last I read about IPv6 in mainstream news, there were major
> concerns cited over some of the security aspects of
The interesting thing, to stay on topic, is that people are willing to
explore a feature called "SCTP" which to my knowledge is younger than
"IPv6". This makes the whole discussion sort of moot, right ?
Speaking for the devil's advocate...
The point of insecurity does not hold up if you loo
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:51:11AM +0100, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
>The interesting thing, to stay on topic, is that people are willing to
>explore a feature called "SCTP" which to my knowledge is younger than
>"IPv6". This makes the whole discussion sort of moot, right ?
In my case, I have a u
> Agreed. But at this stage I can't justify the effort to do anything
> more than have a very cursory glance it at. What benefit would I
> derive from setting up an IPv6 network and attempting to experiment
> with it? My ISP won't support IPv6 and I'm reasonably certain my
> cable-modem doesn't
> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 21:41:40 +1100
> From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:51:11AM +0100, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
> >The interesting thing, to stay on topic, is that people are willing to
> >explore a feature called "SCTP" which to
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:24:08 -0800
Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't set up an IPv6 network. You simply have end nodes that will
> use IPv6 when/if it is available by just making a one-line change in
> rc.conf as opposed to a kernel re-build.
But to make it (an ip v6 network) u
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:24:08 -0800
> Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You don't set up an IPv6 network. You simply have end nodes that will
> > use IPv6 when/if it is available by just making a one-line
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:24:08 -0800
> Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You don't set up an IPv6 network. You simply have end nodes that will
> > use IPv6 when/if it is available by just making a one-line change in
> > rc.conf as opposed to a kernel re-build.
>
> But to make it (an
Hi Michael Gratton!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:46:52 +1100; Michael Gratton wrote about 'Re: INET6 --
and why I don't use it':
>> * I have never liked how IPv6 denotes its addresses by using colon-
>> delimited hexadecimal strings.
> The glib answer would be "an
Hi Jeremy Chadwick!
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:01:43 -0800; Jeremy Chadwick wrote about 'Re: INET6 --
and why I don't use it':
>> Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in
>> command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses,
On 3/6/08, Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other words; if I have machines with ipv6 adresses that I can reach
> globally, but don't have a dns name for them, the usefulness is very
> limited.
>
> Is that challenge solved somehow with ipv6?
> It doesn't look like dyndns.org suppor
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > You don't set up an IPv6 network. You simply have end nodes that will
> > use IPv6 when/if it is available by just making a one-line change in
> > rc.conf as opposed to a kernel re-build.
>
> But to make it (an ip v6 network) useful, I (as
On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:24:08 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Agreed. But at this stage I can't justify the effort to do anything
> > more than have a very cursory glance it at. What benefit would I
> > derive from setting up an IPv6 network and attempting to experiment
> > with it? My ISP won't s
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:14:34 +0100 (CET)
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why use dyndns.org? Your IPv6 address isn't dynamic.
You are correct, of course.
It shows that l I haven't got my head around the
whole ipv6 issue, right?
> My home ISP doesn't support native IPv6 yet (though th
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> > Why use dyndns.org? Your IPv6 address isn't dynamic.
>
> You are correct, of course.
> It shows that l I haven't got my head around the
> whole ipv6 issue, right?
Well, if you've never worked with IPv6 before, it takes
a little time t
> From: JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:19:33 -0300
>
> On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:24:08 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > Agreed. But at this stage I can't justify the effort to do anything
> > > more than have a very cursory glance it at. What benefit would I
> > > derive from
On Sunday 09 March 2008 20:41:51 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > From: JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:19:33 -0300
> >
> > your computer will or better CAN use ipv6 when it is on a ipv6 network
> > and nothing else, ipv6 WILL NOT come eventually available on your ipv4
> > network (
22 matches
Mail list logo
