On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:37:48PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:28:19AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
> >
> > As far as I have tested pf(packet filter) on FreeBSD 5.3R,
> > NAT function with IPv6 does not work well. Log says conversion is
> > done. But source address i
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:28:19AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
>
> As far as I have tested pf(packet filter) on FreeBSD 5.3R,
> NAT function with IPv6 does not work well. Log says conversion is
> done. But source address is not translated. Though I asked
> about it in freebsd-pf mailing list
: Song Du <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPNAT & IPv6
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:40:28 +0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> but i want to do the data redirection transparently :(
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:25:11 +0100 (CET), Patrick M. Hausen
> <[
but i want to do the data redirection transparently :(
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:25:11 +0100 (CET), Patrick M. Hausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > my original ipnat rule is
> > rdr rl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8000 tcp
> > which redirect a priv port to a non-priv port
> >
> >
Hello!
> my original ipnat rule is
> rdr rl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8000 tcp
> which redirect a priv port to a non-priv port
>
> but when i setup dual stack, i find it's unable to handle ipv6 connections.
> when i change 0.0.0.0 to ::0, ipnat complains it can't resolve it.
> even whe
my original ipnat rule is
rdr rl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8000 tcp
which redirect a priv port to a non-priv port
but when i setup dual stack, i find it's unable to handle ipv6 connections.
when i change 0.0.0.0 to ::0, ipnat complains it can't resolve it.
even when i use domains instea
