Re: Ifconfig with rc.conf Broken

2006-02-20 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:56:47PM -0600 I heard the voice of James Wyatt, and lo! it spake thus: > > Don't alias interfaces have to be added to the "network_interfaces=" > line? I thought only "real" interfaces were autodetected... I think you're thinking of interface name aliases, not additiona

Re: Ifconfig with rc.conf Broken

2006-02-20 Thread Miguel Lopes Santos Ramos
> From: James Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Ifconfig with rc.conf Broken > > Don't alias interfaces have to be added to the "network_interfaces=" line? > I thought only "real" interfaces were autodetected... I don't think this is the

Re: Ifconfig with rc.conf Broken

2006-02-20 Thread James Wyatt
Don't alias interfaces have to be added to the "network_interfaces=" line? I thought only "real" interfaces were autodetected... On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, MC wrote: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:20:21 -0800 From: MC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Ifconfig with rc.conf Broken

2006-02-20 Thread MC
Bizarre behavior with configuring the main interface IP with rc.conf: ifconfig_bge0="inet 10.0.0.15 netmask 0xff00" ifconfig_bge0_alias0="inet 10.0.0.16 netmask 0x" # Sample alias entry. defaultrouter="10.0.0.10" Doesn't configure the bge0 interface! But: ifconfig bge0 10.0.0.8 net