On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 06:29:30PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Nottebrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Thursday 22 April 2004 16:16, Dave Horsfall wrote:
: On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Ceri Davies wrote:
:Are there any, umm, release notes for
On Friday 23 April 2004 08:06, Wilko Bulte wrote:
: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#RELEASE
:-CANDIDATE
Notice that the FAQ doesn't talk about -BETA at all.
It is a FAQ, just not *in* the FAQ ;)
Uhm, but it is (has been for almost two years, actuall): In
On Thursday 22 April 2004 11:58, Dave Horsfall wrote:
I decided to take the plunge and perform my very first upgrade, from 4.7
to (I thought) 4.9, by CVSuping RELENG_4 and make buildworld etc.
Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...
Is this release considered
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Horsfall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...
It appears that re changed the way they are tagging releases again.
The last time we had 4.x-BETA was 4.2. A review of the cvs log for
the
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Nottebrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Thursday 22 April 2004 16:16, Dave Horsfall wrote:
: On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Ceri Davies wrote:
:Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm
:in for?
:
: They're in
