't have a patch available yet...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lamont Granquist
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Sung Nae Cho
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD more secure than Windows NT or Windows 2000?
yeah, oka
Sung Nae Cho wrote:
| Thank you all for your generous info on encryption. Hmmm, now I don't
| know what Microsoft actually meant when they advertised Windows NT, 2000
| was "Truly Secure"!
They lied -- as they normally do in the interest of making a
sale to an uninformed user.
To Unsubscribe:
Sung Nae Cho wrote:
> One thing that makes me uncomfortable with both Linux and FreeBSD is that
> unlike Windows NT, both UNIX clones seem to be less secure for a desktop
> use. ( ** Note clones doesn't mean it's any less better than UNIX, it just
> means, it's not officially considered UNIX by OP
> Thank you all for your generous info on encryption. Hmmm, now I don't
> know what Microsoft actually meant when they advertised Windows NT, 2000
> was "Truly Secure"!
It meant, believe us in all we say and do! Give us your money because you
will believe whatever we say
It's all "advertis
Hi,
Thank you all for your generous info on encryption. Hmmm, now I don't
know what Microsoft actually meant when they advertised Windows NT, 2000
was "Truly Secure"!
Regards,
Sung N. Cho,
Saturday, July 21, 2001.
Dept. of Physics,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.
On S
:Hi,
:
:One thing that makes me uncomfortable with both Linux and FreeBSD is that
:unlike Windows NT, both UNIX clones seem to be less secure for a desktop
:use. ( ** Note clones doesn't mean it's any less better than UNIX, it just
:means, it's not officially considered UNIX by OPEN-GROUP ** ) I
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Sung Nae Cho wrote:
> Windows NT is very secure in that matter. Simply reinstalling Windows
> NT will not let you read someone else's file. Also, it won't let you
> reinstall Windows NT without verifying that you're the right
> administrator! During the reinstall, it asks
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:45:05PM -0400, Sung Nae Cho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One thing that makes me uncomfortable with both Linux and FreeBSD is that
> unlike Windows NT, both UNIX clones seem to be less secure for a desktop
> use. ( ** Note clones doesn't mean it's any less better than UNIX, it just
Hi,
One thing that makes me uncomfortable with both Linux and FreeBSD is that
unlike Windows NT, both UNIX clones seem to be less secure for a desktop
use. ( ** Note clones doesn't mean it's any less better than UNIX, it just
means, it's not officially considered UNIX by OPEN-GROUP ** ) I've use
