Re: Junior Annoying Hacker Task

2002-02-04 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 03:29:50 -0800 > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Terry et al, > > > Let me know the form you want the hierarchy to take, so > > you can stick it into the GTK hierarchy thingy; I'll be > > happy to crank out some

RE: Junior Annoying Hacker Task

2002-02-03 Thread Andrew Cowan
> I don't see how it would make it any easier than using flat text > files, unless you're planning on providing a DTD and using generic XML > gui editors. Putting data in XML doesn't automatically imbue it with > anything, except the ability to use generic XML tools on it. Of > course, given li

Re: Junior Annoying Hacker Task

2002-02-02 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:05:34PM +, Pete French wrote: > > And I, somehow, had failed to notice that there's no NSS on FreeBSD. > > *smacks self on head* Not quite so simple after all, I guess > > Is this NSS as in the Mozilla crypt stuff ? If so then what does it > have to do with ne

Re: Junior Annoying Hacker Task

2002-02-02 Thread Pete French
> And I, somehow, had failed to notice that there's no NSS on FreeBSD. > *smacks self on head* Not quite so simple after all, I guess Is this NSS as in the Mozilla crypt stuff ? If so then what does it have to do with netinfo - or is OSX netinfo different to normal netinfo ? [did they break

Re: Junior Annoying Hacker Task

2002-02-02 Thread Brandon S. Allbery
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 14:50, Pete French wrote: > > AFAIK, Netinfo on Mac OS X is implemented deep. That is, it overrules > > standard libc behaviour (like the resolver, fstab and other things), Yes > > it's userspace jim, but not as we know it :) > > This was certainly true on NeXT's - you nee