On Wednesday 15 August 2001 14:03, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> ++ 15/08/01 19:00 - - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> | What are the chances of KDE 2.2 making it into the ports tree before
> | 4.4 is - RELEASE'd?
>
> 100%; will has already committed an update! The hardest part right now
> is actually fetchin
That's what I get for posting from work w/o reading the most recent
traffic! :)
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> ++ 15/08/01 19:00 - - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> | What are the chances of KDE 2.2 making it into the ports tree before 4.4 is -
> | RELEASE'd?
>
> 100%; will has already co
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 07:00:05PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What are the chances of KDE 2.2 making it into the ports tree before 4.4 is -
> RELEASE'd?
It was committed today.
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 07:00:05PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What are the chances of KDE 2.2 making it into the ports tree before 4.4 is -
> RELEASE'd?
>
>
---end quoted text---
I believe KDE 2.2 is already in the ports tree. At least, that's what appears
to be building on my machin
++ 15/08/01 19:00 - - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| What are the chances of KDE 2.2 making it into the ports tree before 4.4 is -
| RELEASE'd?
100%; will has already committed an update! The hardest part right now
is actually fetching the tarballs, every /. reader is trying to download
them too.
-pe
What are the chances of KDE 2.2 making it into the ports tree before 4.4 is -
RELEASE'd?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
