Re: Little whois patch.

1999-12-05 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 11:36:19PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 03:27:15PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > No, I haven't used it, I don't do much day to day production work from > > the 4.x-current playpen box. I'm heading that way now to take a look > > at it a

Re: Little whois patch.

1999-12-05 Thread Gregory Sutter
On Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 09:44:42PM -0500, matt wrote: > > I noticed that the Canadian Internic was being left out of the > whois command line opts, so I thought I'd add it to the options. I really > have no clue who to send this to, or if I should use send-pr maybe, but > it's technically n

Re: Little whois patch.

1999-12-05 Thread Darcy Buskermolen
Now that you mentioned it, my other point about a follow is mute :-) I've played with it, queried over 500 domains with it with excellent results. my only issue with it is since it does everything else automagicly, can we also have it do arpa's as well? Just my solomon comments. At 11:36 PM 1

Re: Little whois patch.

1999-12-05 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 03:27:15PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > No, I haven't used it, I don't do much day to day production work from > the 4.x-current playpen box. I'm heading that way now to take a look > at it and probably smash it onto my production desktop box if it does > what you sa

Re: Little whois patch.

1999-12-05 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 02:54:35PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > Infact you could go one step further and even allow a ~/.whoisrc, > > so my users whouldn't get confused when whois gave them data from > > a routing registry :-) > > > > That was my thinking too, but it really does loo