Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The tag= line for ports should always be . (period, indicating
> HEAD) ...
"always" is a bit too strong here IMO. The tag= line for ports
could reasonably be a release label, if the intent is to retrieve
the ports tree as of that release; granted this would be an uncomm
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Nathan Maier wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>> I am pretty sure that Adam is right about the version mismatch. I used
>> sysinstall to update the ports tree and had to change options from
>> 8.0-RELEASE-p3 to 8.0
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:54:41AM -0500, Nathan Peet Maier wrote:
> I changed my label in ports-supfile to tag=. which I found in
> documentation as applicable to ports supfiles. Is this different
> from source supfiles where "." means CURRENT release.
Correct. The tag= line for
Okay,
THe mouse is working well enough. I changed my label in
ports-supfile to tag=. which I found in documentation as
applicable to ports supfiles. Is this different from source
supfiles where "." means CURRENT release.
Anyhow, after portupgrade -a, I tried xdm with 'Allo
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Nathan Maier wrote:
> Hi again,
>I am pretty sure that Adam is right about the version mismatch. I used
> sysinstall to update the ports tree and had to change options from
> 8.0-RELEASE-p3 to 8.0-RELEASE. Cvsup deleted the ports tree. Don't know if
> I have
Hi again,
I am pretty sure that Adam is right about the version mismatch. I
used sysinstall to update the ports tree and had to change options from
8.0-RELEASE-p3 to 8.0-RELEASE. Cvsup deleted the ports tree. Don't know
if I have to change the RELENG_8 to something else.
# $FreeBSD: sr
