CARP can let you failover an IP address and ggated provides remote
access to a physical disk device but the combination will not give you
a fault tolerant server. One major problem is that you will lose the
content of the cache when a system fails - this amounts to roughly the
last 30
You probably can't replace defective hardware so fast that the users
don't notice. They will probably also notice when a system crash
garbles the filesystem.
that was the reason why i would make a mirrored system with CARP
and ggated...
Based on your comments of low cost and massive
On Tue, 2006-Apr-11 13:15:48 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
You probably can't replace defective hardware so fast that the users
don't notice. They will probably also notice when a system crash
garbles the filesystem.
that was the reason why i would make a mirrored system with CARP
and
Hello Chuck,
Hello @all,
2006/4/7, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Michael Schuh wrote:
Hi everyone,
i need suggestions and hints about an redundant
storage-system.
My requirements are:
a Storage that is available via Network, flexible in scalation,
and must be redundant, and
On Mon, 2006-Apr-10 14:11:46 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
so that i have sign a Solution with cheap HW, ok this cheap HW is not very
stable and never so performant like the right Hardware, but if i use
this solution,
so i can relative fast replace defect items with new HW.
You probably can't
- Original Message -
From: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Needs suggestion for redundant Storage
On Mon, 2006-Apr-10 14:11:46 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
so that i
Hi everyone,
i need suggestions and hints about an redundant
storage-system.
My requirements are:
a Storage that is available via Network, flexible in scalation,
and must be redundant, and cheap if possible
My Own suggestion was this scenario:
2 boxes very cheap for ~300$
2 or more
Michael Schuh wrote:
Hi everyone,
i need suggestions and hints about an redundant
storage-system.
My requirements are:
a Storage that is available via Network, flexible in scalation,
and must be redundant, and cheap if possible
My Own suggestion was this scenario:
2 boxes very cheap for
