On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:53:08AM -0500, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> > > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are
> > > bugs in this ver
On 04 Mar 2016, at 15:53, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
>>> I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are
>>> bugs in this version of clang tha
On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:45, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
>
> I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are
> bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with.
Which specific bugs are those?
> Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD
> s
On 05/03/2016 01:23, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are
bugs in this version of clang that I'm having troub
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are
> bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with.
>
> Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD
> supported? I have n