Re: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?)

2000-01-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 08:48:08AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > UCB and AT&T had agreed that there were to be no new releases of BSD > and that 4BSD was the final release. 4.1BSD - 4.4BSD were named such > because they were "officially" only modifications to 4BSD and

RE: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?)

2000-01-10 Thread Allen Pulsifer
> Actually, no. The distribution is called 4.4BSD, not BSD 4.4. The same > goes for 4.1 or 4.2 which were known as 4.1BSD and 4.2BSD respectively. > Anyone who understands what BSD is, will know the difference. You're right. My bad. 4.4BSD. See how easy it is to get it confused? Allen

RE: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?)

2000-01-10 Thread Tom
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Allen Pulsifer wrote: > I have to agree with this poster. The next release should be > called FreeBSD 5.0. > > "BSD 4.4" is a desciptive term still used to describe a whole > family of OS's. People outside the FreeBSD circle are going to be > confused between BSD 4.4 and F

Re: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?)

2000-01-10 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 09:16:17AM -0500, James E. Housley wrote: > Allen Pulsifer wrote: > > > > "BSD 4.4" is a desciptive term still used to describe a whole > > family of OS's. People outside the FreeBSD circle are going to be > > confused between BSD 4.4 and FreeBSD 4.4. This can easily be