Re: PHP vulnerability and portupgrade

2004-12-22 Thread Charles Ulrich
Mark Andrews said: >> Thanks a lot for your reply. If I understand things correctly, I need to >> maintain two cvsup files - one that tracks security issues in the base >> FreeBSD 5.3 system (tag=RELENG_5_3, src-all) and one for the ports >> collection (tag=. , ports-all). Then every time I recei

Re: PHP vulnerability and portupgrade

2004-12-21 Thread Yoshiaki Kasahara
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:52:01 +0800, Ladislav Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Thanks a lot for your reply. If I understand things correctly, I need to > maintain two cvsup files - one that tracks security issues in the base > FreeBSD 5.3 system (tag=RELENG_5_3, src-all) and one for the

Re: PHP vulnerability and portupgrade

2004-12-21 Thread Mark Andrews
> On Wednesday 22 December 2004 09:06, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Due to the recently discovered vulnerability in PHP versions older than > > > 4.3.10 and 5.0.3, I decided to take a look at portupgrade to see if it > > > is a good way to keep the ports collection up-to-date with

Re: PHP vulnerability and portupgrade

2004-12-21 Thread Ladislav Bodnar
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 09:06, Mark Andrews wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Due to the recently discovered vulnerability in PHP versions older than > > 4.3.10 and 5.0.3, I decided to take a look at portupgrade to see if it > > is a good way to keep the ports collection up-to-date with respect to >

Re: PHP vulnerability and portupgrade

2004-12-21 Thread Mark Andrews
> Hello, > > Due to the recently discovered vulnerability in PHP versions older than > 4.3.10 and 5.0.3, I decided to take a look at portupgrade to see if it is a > good way to keep the ports collection up-to-date with respect to security > issues. I ran cvsup on the security branch (tag=RELEN

PHP vulnerability and portupgrade

2004-12-21 Thread Ladislav Bodnar
Hello, Due to the recently discovered vulnerability in PHP versions older than 4.3.10 and 5.0.3, I decided to take a look at portupgrade to see if it is a good way to keep the ports collection up-to-date with respect to security issues. I ran cvsup on the security branch (tag=RELENG_5_3), then