On 06/11/07 17:30, ExTaZyTi wrote:
> There are some problems, first DDoS (hardware DDoS) in the system.
'hardware DDoS'... funny thing!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
ExTaZyTi wrote this message on Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 18:30 +0300:
> There are some problems, first DDoS (hardware DDoS) in the system.
> I compile some program and when start it my system blocks and restart
> (tested and on other system 6.2-stable and again this DDoS).
Please email the FreeBSD secu
> There are some problems, first DDoS (hardware DDoS) in the system.
I'd like to know what you mean by "hardware DDoS"
~k
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any m
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Kevin K. wrote:
There are some problems, first DDoS (hardware DDoS) in the system.
I'd like to know what you mean by "hardware DDoS"
I'm not sure what the OP meant, but I can provide examples of a
hardware DDoS.
Way back when, certain machines were equipped w
On 6/11/07, Kevin K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some problems, first DDoS (hardware DDoS) in the system.
I'd like to know what you mean by "hardware DDoS"
~k
It's very clear that English isn't his mother language, and he may
means the DDoS he gets kills his box cpu ..etc.
--
R
At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if
you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if
you weren't careful. :-)
Hi,
I thought DDoS = _Distributed_ Denial of Service where
multiple attacking de
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 6/11/07, Kevin K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some problems, first DDoS (hardware DDoS) in the system.
I'd like to know what you mean by "hardware DDoS"
~k
It's very clear that English isn't his mother language, and he may
means the DDoS he
On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if
you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if
you weren't careful. :-)
Hi,
I thought DDoS = _Distribute
On Monday 11 June 2007 18:05:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if
> >
> >> you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if
* Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070611 13:58] wrote:
> At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if
> >you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if
> >you weren't careful. :-)
>
> Hi,
> I though
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
ExTaZyTi wrote:
> Next problem is the clock, have e 4 minuts different from the world time
> for
> my country. I try to fix this with a "ntpdate otel.net" for example ..
> this
> again return 4 minutes different. I try and the "date" command but it'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[format recovered, please don't top-post]
[also keep @freebsd-stable in cc]
ExTaZyTi wrote:
>> 2007/6/12, Karol Kwiatkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>> ExTaZyTi wrote:
>>> Next problem is the clock, have e 4 minuts different from the world
>> time
>
Hi all,
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[format recovered, please don't top-post]
[also keep @freebsd-stable in cc]
ExTaZyTi wrote:
2007/6/12, Karol Kwiatkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ExTaZyTi wrote:
Next problem is the clock, have e 4
13 matches
Mail list logo
