As I recall, Steve Tremblett wrote:
> So a minor release happens when bugfixes reach a critical mass? Are
> there any actual new features in 4.3 or simply fixes on top of
> 4.2-RELEASE? Do features from -CURRENT get migrated in if they are
> deemed stable enough to ship?
The releases happen mor
+--- Ben Smithurst wrote:
|
| Did you read the first sentence of that FAQ entry? "Short answer: it's
| just a name."
|
| If you cvsup the RELENG_4 branch, you're getting FreeBSD-stable, whether
| it be called -STABLE, -RC, -BETA, -FISHCAKE, -UNSTABLE-AS-HELL, or
| even -CURRENT if someone felt
>
> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 23:49:40 -0500
> From: "Brian D. Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Further question Re: cvsupped to RELENG_4 but got 4.3-RC
>
> At 10:35 PM 4/4/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:32:39PM -0500, Brian D. Woodruff wrote:
> > > Here are my questions
Brian D. Woodruff wrote:
> At 10:35 PM 4/4/01 -0400, you wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:32:39PM -0500, Brian D. Woodruff wrote:
>>> Here are my questions:
>>>
>>> 1.) is there a way to specify 4.2-STABLE, which is what I have been using?
>
> excellent answer to part 2
>
> can anyone tell
I agree with you completely, Bob. The idea of keeping one "master
server" to push out updates to many is extremely useful when you are
maintaining a large number of similar systems. It is much less
work-intensive to maintain several hundred systems if they are running
on exactly the same confi
There may be some value in the multiple servers case, of running one as a
cvs server, and updating all the others off that one. Then all your servers
are reflections of the one that is cvsupping the -> remote-cvs-server
just a thought.
Bob
>
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Brian D. Woodruff wrote:
>
On 05-Apr-2001 Ken Bolingbroke wrote:
> If you require absolute consistency across servers, you need to either
> update all servers from the very same source, or specify an exact CVS tag
> to get the same sources for all servers.
You can check out a branch at a specific time using -D which yo
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Brian D. Woodruff wrote:
> At 10:35 PM 4/4/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:32:39PM -0500, Brian D. Woodruff wrote:
> > > Here are my questions:
> > >
> > > 1.) is there a way to specify 4.2-STABLE, which is what I have been using?
>
> can anyone tell me h
If memory serves me right, "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2001 23:49:40 -0500
> "Brian D. Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> BW> I would rather be consistent across my servers than have some be one
> BW> release past the others.
>
> Allow me to investigate this a li
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001 23:49:40 -0500
"Brian D. Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BW> I would rather be consistent across my servers than have some be one
BW> release past the others.
Allow me to investigate this a little further.
Do you want to have all your servers running t
10 matches
Mail list logo
