Re: cvsup-16-f issue

2002-01-12 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:29:10PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > Andrew McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > > > Is there a package for cvsup that doesn't require X ? > > > I know that we have the -g key, still the new version has a feature?: > > > on a fresh installation of 4.4 STABLE it gives me only

Re: cvsup-16-f issue

2002-01-11 Thread Bzdik BSD
Andrew, thank you very much for your no_X build. It works fine here. __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the

Re: RE: cvsup-16-f issue

2002-01-11 Thread Gunnar Flygt
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:44PM +0100, Thomas Gravgaard wrote: > > I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a > > cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will > > run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version > > won't run on a system without X11, a

RE: cvsup-16-f issue

2002-01-11 Thread Christopher Schulte
At 03:13 PM 1/11/2002 +0100, Thomas Gravgaard wrote: >I do see your point... It is not good having to install that darn M3 compiler This was the idea of the cvsup-bin port, which looks not to be maintained any longer... ? >+-+

RE: cvsup-16-f issue

2002-01-11 Thread Thomas Gravgaard
> I happen to think that cvsup is one program that should be added as a > package. You reduce the side effects introduced by having one port > that needs a modula compiler. The s1g site has both versions and you > download your choice. I do see your point... It is not good having to install th

Re: cvsup-16-f issue

2002-01-11 Thread Kent Stewart
Thomas Gravgaard wrote: >>I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a >>cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will >>run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version >>won't run on a system without X11, and it's certainly >>reasonable to *want* to ru