On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:16:29AM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Morgan Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> > With all the trouble people are having with this, perhaps the previous
> > (working) USB/ulpt code should be put back in, and leave the newer code
> > for testing under -current until it is tr
Morgan Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> With all the trouble people are having with this, perhaps the previous
> (working) USB/ulpt code should be put back in, and leave the newer code
> for testing under -current until it is truly ready for -stable.
It would certainly get my agreement. I'd be
* Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020228 04:29]:
>
>
> Ceri wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:14:28PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> >
> >>On a system cvsupped three days ago, trying to print to the USB system
> >>reliably generates a page fault panic on an otherwise reliable system.
> >>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:41:01AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
>
>
> Ceri wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:14:28PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> >
> >>On a system cvsupped three days ago, trying to print to the USB system
> >>reliably generates a page fault panic on an otherwise reliable syst
Ceri wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:14:28PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
>>On a system cvsupped three days ago, trying to print to the USB system
>>reliably generates a page fault panic on an otherwise reliable system.
>>
>>I know there was some problems with renaming USB structures in the
