Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c

2005-10-28 Thread James Long
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:05, James Long wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:05:23 +0930 From: Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c The command I use most is wicontrol -L Try ifconfig ath0 list scan

Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c

2005-10-28 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:59, James Long wrote: # ifconfig ath0 list scan ifconfig: list: bad value # Er weird.. Is this in 6.0 or 5.x? FreeBSD t21.museum.rain.com 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 24 12:49:5 5 PDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/T21

Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c

2005-10-27 Thread James Long
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:05:23 +0930 From: Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c The command I use most is wicontrol -L Try ifconfig ath0 list scan # ifconfig ath0 list scan ifconfig: list: bad value

Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c

2005-10-27 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:05, James Long wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:05:23 +0930 From: Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c The command I use most is wicontrol -L Try ifconfig ath0 list scan

RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c

2005-10-26 Thread James Long
wicontrol.c defaults to the wi interface. I used to have a wi device, but it eventually took a dump and I bought a new ath-based card, which works flawlessly AFAIK, after four months or so. But I grow weary of having to specify -i ath0 every time I run wicontrol. Please review the following

Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c

2005-10-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 03:20:47PM -0700, James Long wrote: wicontrol.c defaults to the wi interface. I used to have a wi device, but it eventually took a dump and I bought a new ath-based card, which works flawlessly AFAIK, after four months or so. But I grow weary of having to specify -i

Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c

2005-10-26 Thread James Long
wicontrol is obsolete and you should not need to use it, particularly for ath(4) devices. Why are you using it? Is some feature you need missing from ifconfig? The command I use most is wicontrol -L ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: RFC: proposed patch for /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c

2005-10-26 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:31, James Long wrote: wicontrol is obsolete and you should not need to use it, particularly for ath(4) devices. Why are you using it? Is some feature you need missing from ifconfig? The command I use most is wicontrol -L Try ifconfig ath0 list scan -- Daniel