Re: 4.3-BETA: make kernel -j N broken

2001-03-24 Thread Matt Heckaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: ... : I believe I had the same problem, but with make -j4 buildkernel . So I : would hope make depend was run first. : : Oops, I wasn't awake when I wrote that. It is conceivable that make : buildkernel

Re: 4.3-BETA crash on 'mount /dev/acd0c /mnt'

2001-03-22 Thread Nate Dannenberg
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, David Taylor wrote: (using: 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #3: Tue Mar 6 18:39:44 GMT 2001) mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /mnt #works ok OTOH, mount /dev/acd0c /mnt causes the following panic: I've also experienced problems mounting CD-ROM discs, to the extent that if

Re: 4.3-BETA crash on 'mount /dev/acd0c /mnt'

2001-03-22 Thread Kent Stewart
Nate Dannenberg wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, David Taylor wrote: (using: 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #3: Tue Mar 6 18:39:44 GMT 2001) mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /mnt #works ok OTOH, mount /dev/acd0c /mnt causes the following panic: I've also experienced problems

Re: 4.3-BETA

2001-03-20 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:53:50 -0800 Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KS - -RELEASE branch doesn't change. To my mind this is all backwards. KS Not in my mind. The -release branch always has something wrong with it But -release is *not* a branch, it is a point. It cannot change, it

Re: 4.3-BETA

2001-03-19 Thread The Babbler
--- Mensaje Original -- De: Haikal Saadh [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Para: Mike Meyer [[EMAIL PROTECTED]], Francisco Reyes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Cc: Mike Meyer [[EMAIL PROTECTED]], Haikal Saadh [[EMAIL PROTECTED]], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Asunto: Re: 4.3-BETA Fecha: 18/03/20

Re: 4.3-BETA

2001-03-19 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:33:03PM -0500, The Babbler wrote: Thus, after 4.2-RELEASE, we got 4.3-STABLE, which is now 4.3-BETA and will become 4.3-RC, and finally the same code base will be frozen into 4.3-RELEASE, at which time 4.4-STABLE will come into existance. Almost. 4.2-RELEASE started

Re: 4.3-BETA

2001-03-16 Thread Haikal Saadh
--- Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is a BETA system? Is it similiar to CURRENT? Please search through the mailing list archives before asking questions. This has been answered many times over the last two weeks. 4.2-STABLE became 4.3-BETA when the code was frozen,

Re: 4.3-BETA available for FTP

2001-03-08 Thread Luigi Rizzo
It already appears as if dummynet has been broken in 4.3 and is causing panics. At least 3 reports I have seen so far of people who have had to disable DUMMYNET. can you point me to these reports ? I'd love to have a look at them and see what is wrong (especially because after the last batch

Re: 4.3-BETA available for FTP

2001-03-08 Thread Luigi Rizzo
It already appears as if dummynet has been broken in 4.3 and is causing panics. At least 3 reports I have seen so far of people who have had to disable DUMMYNET. can you point me to these reports ? I'd love to have a look i actually found one in the freebsd-stable mailing list

Re: 4.3-BETA available for FTP

2001-03-08 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
It already appears as if dummynet has been broken in 4.3 and is causing panics. At least 3 reports I have seen so far of people who have had to disable DUMMYNET. can you point me to these reports ? I'd love to have a look at them and see what is wrong (especially because after the last