Re: ATA driver feature request

2002-01-24 Thread Chris Dillon
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, SXren Schmidt wrote: > > However, the warning message would be slightly reworded like "non-ATA66 > > compliant cable or second device" > > Good point, I'll get something done about this... Just as a note, it doesn't have to just be the cable or the second device, it can be e

Re: ATA driver feature request

2002-01-22 Thread jacks
Yes, I always see this same thing if I place an older CD-ROM slave on the same cable. It drops to UDMA33. If I remove the CD-ROM, then the systme sees the cable fine as ATA100. If I then put my new CD-ROM on the cable, it likes that too. At 12:04 AM 1.22.2002 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >On