On 04/10/15 16:42, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2015, at 21:32, Michael Grimm wrote:
>>
>> Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 Apr 2015, at 20:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
>>
I can confirm that. r281288 compiles without failing, r281289 fails.
>>>
>>> I've tried all possible ways of reprodu
Dimitry Andric wrote
> Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Compilation at r281289 is on its way. I'll send you a link after completion.
>
> Thanks, but you can stop that compilation now. :)
I was just about sending you my logfile :-)
> I finally managed to
> reproduce the problem, and it turns out I also
On 10 Apr 2015, at 21:32, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
> Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
>> On 10 Apr 2015, at 20:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>>> I can confirm that. r281288 compiles without failing, r281289 fails.
>>
>> I've tried all possible ways of reproducing this problem, but it always
>> works for m
Michael Grimm wrote:
> I'am seeing this too. Same error messages.
>
> Latest revision failing is:
>
> | Relative URL: ^/stable/10
> | Revision: 281372
>
> Latest revision compiling without any issue is:
>
> | Relative URL: ^/stable/10
> | Revision: 281265
>
> /etc/src.conf and /etc/make.conf
