On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:59, James Long wrote:
> > > # ifconfig ath0 list scan
> > > ifconfig: list: bad value
> > > #
> >
> > Er weird..
> > Is this in 6.0 or 5.x?
>
> FreeBSD t21.museum.rain.com 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 24
> 12:49:5 5 PDT 2005
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:05, James Long wrote:
> > > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:05:23 +0930
> > > From: "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: RFC: proposed patch for
> > > /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wico
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:05, James Long wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:05:23 +0930
> > From: "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: RFC: proposed patch for
> > /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c
> >
> > > The
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:05:23 +0930
> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: RFC: proposed patch for
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c
>
> > The command I use most is wicontrol -L
>
> Try ifconfig ath0 list sca
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:31, James Long wrote:
> > wicontrol is obsolete and you should not need to use it, particularly
> > for ath(4) devices. Why are you using it? Is some feature you need
> > missing from ifconfig?
>
> The command I use most is wicontrol -L
Try ifconfig ath0 list scan
--
Dan
> wicontrol is obsolete and you should not need to use it, particularly
> for ath(4) devices. Why are you using it? Is some feature you need
> missing from ifconfig?
The command I use most is wicontrol -L
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 03:20:47PM -0700, James Long wrote:
> wicontrol.c defaults to the "wi" interface. I used to have a
> wi device, but it eventually took a dump and I bought a new
> ath-based card, which works flawlessly AFAIK, after four months
> or so.
>
> But I grow weary of having to spe
