Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-17 Thread Shiv. Nath
On 16/06/2012 21:03, Shiv. Nath wrote: Dear Matthew, Matthew, one a, one e. first thanks for assisting to secure 22/25 ports from brute force attack. i wish to consult if the following white list looks fine to exclude trusted networks (own network) int0="em0" secured_attack_ports="{21,22,25}"

Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/06/2012 21:03, Shiv. Nath wrote: > Dear Metthew, Matthew, one a, one e. > first thanks for assisting to secure 22/25 ports from brute force attack. > i wish to consult if the following white list looks fine to exclude > trusted networks (own network) > > > > int0="em0" > secured_attack_p

Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-16 Thread Shiv. Nath
>> Ooops. Yes, -t bruteforce is correct. "expire 604800" means delete >> entries after they've been in the table for that number of seconds (ie >> after one week) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> -- >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard >>