On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>>
>> Just updated to 7-STABLE last night and found that Truecrypt (which
>> uses a combination of fuse and mdconfig to mount its encrypted
>> volumes) is now completely unable to mount its encrypted volumes.
>> I'
Matt wrote:
Just updated to 7-STABLE last night and found that Truecrypt (which
uses a combination of fuse and mdconfig to mount its encrypted
volumes) is now completely unable to mount its encrypted volumes.
I've rebuilt fusefs-kmod and fusefs-libs as well as Truecrypt to no
avail.
Silly quest
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Ken Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
> implemented without ABI breakage, and it is decided that the fix
> warrants the
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 05:44:17AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Ken Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080729 08:47] wrote:
> >
> > Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> > "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
> > implemented without
* Ken Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080729 08:47] wrote:
>
> Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
> implemented without ABI breakage, and it is decided that the fix
> warrants the impact of the AB
Am Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008 13:30:31 schrieben Sie:
> I do not use the fuse fs myself. But the issue was raised during the
> internal discussion of the MFC, and it seems that fuse could be not
> affected.
>
> The change only adds the field at the end of the vnode structure, so all
> existing fields
David Southwell wrote:
It sure helps the understanding bit but how about specific instructions about
who is to what to do in this instance?
I fear that the forest is getting lost for the trees here. :)
Under most (90% or more) circumstances "stuff," be that kernel modules
or userland binaries
* Ian FREISLICH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ABI breakage that Ken refers to here means that a change required
> to fix a bug cannot be made while maintaining binary compatibility
> with previous versions. Any program that makes use of (I'm guessing)
> fcntl(2) or flock(2) that runs on 7.0, will n
David Southwell wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 07:27:27 Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > ABI breakage that Ken refers to here means that a change required
> > to fix a bug cannot be made while maintaining binary compatibility
> > with previous versions. Any program that makes use of (I'm guessing)
> >
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 07:55 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 07:27:27 Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
> > > > Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> > > > "Stable Branch
David Southwell wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
> > Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> > "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
>
> Sometimes information gets posted to this list on the assumption that
>
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 07:27:27 Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
> > > Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> > > "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
> >
> > Some
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 04:26:33 Heiko Wundram wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008 13:03:34 schrieb Ronald Klop:
> > I think in this case (the ABI breakage) it is more nice to say: "If you
> > don't know what to do, you wil probably not see any problem because of
> > this."
> > The edge case of w
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 01:26:33PM +0200, Heiko Wundram wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008 13:03:34 schrieb Ronald Klop:
> > I think in this case (the ABI breakage) it is more nice to say: "If you
> > don't know what to do, you wil probably not see any problem because of
> > this."
> > The edge ca
Am Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008 13:03:34 schrieb Ronald Klop:
> I think in this case (the ABI breakage) it is more nice to say: "If you
> don't know what to do, you wil probably not see any problem because of
> this."
> The edge case of what can go wrong is so small, that you must be doing
> quite speci
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:02:52 +0200, Heiko Wundram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008 13:11:31 schrieb David Southwell:
i.e. Circumstances and what commands to apply in those circumstances?
If you don't know what to do, don't run -STABLE?
I think in this case (the ABI b
Am Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008 13:11:31 schrieb David Southwell:
> i.e. Circumstances and what commands to apply in those circumstances?
If you don't know what to do, don't run -STABLE?
--
Heiko Wundram
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 03:11:54 Heiko Wundram wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008 11:47:34 schrieb David Southwell:
> > For those of us who are not as well informed and experienced as others
> > could someone please explain what is meant by an ABI breakage, its
> > implications and how to deal
Am Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008 11:47:34 schrieb David Southwell:
> For those of us who are not as well informed and experienced as others
> could someone please explain what is meant by an ABI breakage, its
> implications and how to deal with them.
ABI (Application Binary Interface) is a term used t
On 7/30/08, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
> > Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> > "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
> > implemented without ABI breakage, and
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:47:34AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
> > Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> > "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
> > implemented without ABI breaka
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:47:34 David Southwell wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
...
> For those of us who are not as well informed and experienced as others
> could someone please explain what is meant by an ABI breakage, its
> implications and how to deal with them.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:47:34 +0200, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
"Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
implemented without ABI
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote:
> Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in
> "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be
> implemented without ABI breakage, and it is decided that the fix
> warrants the impact of the ABI break
24 matches
Mail list logo
