LI Xin wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > LI Xin wrote:
> > > I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> > > should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
> >
> > Yes, that would be very useful. But it should also take
> > any includes into account.
> >
> > It was ver
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> LI Xin wrote:
> > I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> > should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
>
> Yes, that would be very useful. But it should also take
> any includes into account.
>
> It was very annoying to discover that INCLUDE_CON
LI Xin wrote:
> I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
Yes, that would be very useful. But it should also take
any includes into account.
It was very annoying to discover that INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE
gave me only two lines for o
> regression that was introduced late in the 6.2 release cycle. I'm
> personally pretty skeptical that this could cause a problem, although
> I'm admittedly a little biased, plus there weren't a lot of details in
> your email as to what the problem is.
Well, you are right - it wont run a stock -R
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:23:53PM +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
[..]
> >> I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> >> should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
> >
> > I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
> > also s
On Mar 19, 2007, at 9:24 AM, LI Xin wrote:
I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
ew yucky
What I do is keep my kernel configs in subversion. I have a "common"
component which applies to all systems under my control,
If memory serves me right, Pete French wrote:
> I appear to have a machine which will not run RELENG_6_2, though it runs
> the released code quite happily. Is there a CVS tag I can use to revert the
> sources back to the way they were on RELEASE? I want to be able to
> verify that this is and track
- Original Message -
From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, it does. You get full configuration file from sysctl(8) or from
config -k , and config(8) is modified in a way, that lets you to
use this file without additional trimming.
Sounds like a very worth while addition,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:32:48PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
> >also seem to have problem with kernel configuration recovery. In my case
>
- Original Message -
From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
also seem to have problem with kernel configuration recovery. In my case
I came with a method of obtaining a configuration of a running kernel
via sy
Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:33:44PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> I think this is a very good idea, I've been caught at least once
>> not being able to recreate a working kernel due to the loss of
>> the original config file.
>>
>>Steve
>>
>> - Original Message
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:33:44PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
> I think this is a very good idea, I've been caught at least once
> not being able to recreate a working kernel due to the loss of
> the original config file.
>
>Steve
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "LI Xin" <[EMAIL
> I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
never seen it before - if it does what it sounds like it does then it
would be very useful!
-pete.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
I think this is a very good idea, I've been caught at least once
not being able to recreate a working kernel due to the loss of
the original config file.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "LI Xin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe
Pete French wrote:
>> I think you will want RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE.
>
> thanks (and to the others who responded)
>
>> What happens with RELENG_6_2, IIRC there was only very limited changes
>> to kernel which should only affect IPv6...
>
> Indeed! Part of the reason I want to do the revert is to ma
> I think you will want RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE.
thanks (and to the others who responded)
> What happens with RELENG_6_2, IIRC there was only very limited changes
> to kernel which should only affect IPv6...
Indeed! Part of the reason I want to do the revert is to make absolutely
sure that it runs
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:31:54 +
Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I appear to have a machine which will not run RELENG_6_2, though it runs
> the released code quite happily. Is there a CVS tag I can use to revert the
> sources back to the way they were on RELEASE? I want to be able to
>
Pete French wrote:
> I appear to have a machine which will not run RELENG_6_2, though it runs
> the released code quite happily. Is there a CVS tag I can use to revert the
> sources back to the way they were on RELEASE? I want to be able to
> verify that this is and track down what changed! I don't
I appear to have a machine which will not run RELENG_6_2, though it runs
the released code quite happily. Is there a CVS tag I can use to revert the
sources back to the way they were on RELEASE? I want to be able to
verify that this is and track down what changed! I don't think it should
ever be th
19 matches
Mail list logo
