> > Quite correct. I have done this for several perl versions now, and
> > the work involved is quite scarey.
>
> Not that I'm a fan of the GPL, but wouldn't importation of gmake
> into the toolchain that gets installed by default help this problem
> along enormously?
No. It will make it wor
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:08:53AM -0500, Chris BeHanna wrote:
>
> > Not that I'm a fan of the GPL, but wouldn't importation of gmake
> > into the toolchain that gets installed by default help this problem
> > along enormously?
>
> What can it do
[ On Monday, December 25, JR Boyens wrote: ]
> Don't expect much on this one. I have sent a few emails myself and got
> the cold shoulder for my troubles. I guess unless you (we) attempt it
> yourself (ourselves) 5.03 stays.
>
> Lemme know,
>
In years past when this has come up before (when Pe
Don't expect much on this one. I have sent a few emails myself and got
the cold shoulder for my troubles. I guess unless you (we) attempt it
yourself (ourselves) 5.03 stays.
Lemme know,
JR Boyens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 06:45:25PM -0500 or thereabouts, Stan Brown wrote:
> Is t
Is there a plan to upgrared the perl in the STABLE tree to something a bit newer
(5.6) than the somewhat old 5.03 that's there now?
If so, whne should I expect to see this?
--
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
--
Windows 98: n.
