Re: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-11-01 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2002-11-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : > NB, I had to apply the following patch in order to compile > a kernel *without* ATAPICAM; I'm not 100% sure it's the > correct patch. Indeed. Will fix, thanks. Thomas. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "u

Re: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-11-01 Thread arno
Thomas, > Le 2002-10-31, Andy Sparrow écrivait : > > > Yup, that's probably it. I just (re)patched my src tree after a fresh > > cvsup, and this file fails to patch with atapicam-STABLE-config-20020820. > > diff. Here's sys/conf/files.rej: > > A patch is not needed anymore: I have MFCd ATAPI/CA

Re: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-11-01 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-11-01 00:22:42 (+0100), Thomas Quinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 2002-10-31, Andy Sparrow écrivait : > > > Yup, that's probably it. I just (re)patched my src tree after a fresh > > cvsup, and this file fails to patch with atapicam-STABLE-config-20020820. > > diff. Here's sys/conf/fil

Re: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-31 Thread Andy Sparrow
> Le 2002-10-31, Andy Sparrow écrivait : > > > Yup, that's probably it. I just (re)patched my src tree after a fresh > > cvsup, and this file fails to patch with atapicam-STABLE-config-20020820. > > diff. Here's sys/conf/files.rej: > > A patch is not needed anymore: I have MFCd ATAPI/CAM on the

Re: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-31 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2002-10-31, Andy Sparrow écrivait : > Yup, that's probably it. I just (re)patched my src tree after a fresh > cvsup, and this file fails to patch with atapicam-STABLE-config-20020820. > diff. Here's sys/conf/files.rej: A patch is not needed anymore: I have MFCd ATAPI/CAM on the RELENG_4 branc

Re: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-29 Thread Hiroyuki CHIBA
Hi, May I correct some discriptions? From: Hiroyuki CHIBA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation help and patching Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:23:39 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> clin> They will be made under /usr/obj/{path of src}, may be /usr/obj/usr/src

Re: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-29 Thread Hiroyuki CHIBA
Hi, From: "TooMany Mirrors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: SCSI emulation help and patching Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:50:19 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Where is the kernels tmp build dir? and I'm using the new make buildkernel > KERNCONF=KERNE

RE: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-29 Thread Michael Joyner
should be under /usr/src/sys/compile presuming of course that the KERNCONF method uses the same dir. Quoting TooMany Mirrors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Where is the kernels tmp build dir? and I'm using the new make buildkernel > KERNCONF=KERNEL method, not the old ./config cd ../../make etc

RE: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-29 Thread TooMany Mirrors
Where is the kernels tmp build dir? and I'm using the new make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL method, not the old ./config cd ../../make etc. _ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/a

Re: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-29 Thread joe
On October 29, 2002 04:52 pm, Michael Joyner wrote: > there is a third file you need to download > > atapicam-20020820.diff > atapicam-STABLE-config-20020820.diff > cam_xpt.c.diff > > Quoting TooMany Mirrors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 28 12:16:28 EST 200

RE: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-29 Thread Michael Joyner
did you remove the kernel temporary build directory and re-run config before re-building? Quoting TooMany Mirrors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Ok, I am still getting the same build error about unknow device as before. > All three patches apply without errors but the kernel build still fails. I >

RE: SCSI emulation help and patching

2002-10-29 Thread TooMany Mirrors
Ok, I am still getting the same build error about unknow device as before. All three patches apply without errors but the kernel build still fails. I have included all info incuding the kernel in a previous email. If someone can figure out what the heck I am doing different than everyone else