On Monday 27 October 2008 20:03:21 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I had no idea users were blindly uncommenting examples in
well seems you're new in support business then :)
the issue might be the reason why weapons are not delivered with roles in the
chambers ... so developers probably should take
on 27/10/2008 21:59 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have
enabled SMART checking using the smartmontools as usual for the disk
(/dev/ad6 -a -S on -s (S/../.././03|L/../../7/03) -m root). The problem
is that each time the test runs I
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have
enabled SMART checking using the smartmontools as usual for the disk
(/dev/ad6 -a -S on -s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have
enabled SMART checking using the
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:22:03PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Second, your short offline test runs at 0300, but the errors you're
seeing are at 0454 in the morning. A short offline test does not
take
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
they're used for? :-) If so, you'd know that running them periodically
is more
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
they're used for?
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:22:03PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Second, your short offline test runs at 0300, but the errors you're
seeing are at 0454 in the morning. A short
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and
martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything
besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:53 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:22:03PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
skipped
Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
they're used for? :-) If so, you'd know that running them
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 21:45 +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:30:26PM -0400, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 21:45 +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM
IMO, A much better option to run on a weekly basis is to use a RAID
controller with verify feature (eg. 3ware) or use ZFS scrub mode.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
17 matches
Mail list logo
